What are the similarities and differences of the poems Hiroshima by Angela Clifton and Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen? What point of view are the poems? What are the themes of the poems? What are the contrasts and comparisons of the two poems? Mention about the Diction, Atmosphere, Type of Verse, Imagery and Subject/Theme of the poems.
OK. I was just asking for HELP. THANKS ANYWAY FOR THE BIG HELP.
Hello i was having some truble with 3 and 10 can you help?
To compare and contrast the poems "Hiroshima" by Angela Clifton and "Dulce Et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen, we will analyze various aspects, such as the point of view, themes, contrasts, and comparisons. We will also examine the diction, atmosphere, type of verse, imagery, and subject/themes of the poems.
First, let's address the point of view of the poems. In "Hiroshima," Angela Clifton writes from a third-person omniscient perspective, whereas in "Dulce Et Decorum Est," Wilfred Owen utilizes a first-person narrative, sharing his firsthand experience of war.
As for the themes, both poems convey the horrors of war, but they approach the subject matter differently. In "Hiroshima," the theme centers around the devastating aftermath of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima during World War II. The poem reflects on the suffering, destruction, and loss of innocent lives caused by the bombings. On the other hand, "Dulce Et Decorum Est" revolves around the disillusionment and criticism of the glorification of war. Owen exposes the harsh realities and the lasting psychological impact endured by soldiers.
Now, let's delve into the contrasts and comparisons between the two poems. While both poems discuss war-related topics, "Hiroshima" focuses on the aftermath of a specific event, whereas "Dulce Et Decorum Est" explores the broader experiences of soldiers during warfare. Additionally, "Hiroshima" emphasizes the destructive impact of technology and the innocent lives affected, whereas "Dulce Et Decorum Est" portrays the physical and emotional trauma endured by soldiers on the frontlines.
When it comes to diction, the poems use distinct language styles. In "Hiroshima," Clifton employs descriptive and evocative language, painting vivid pictures of the destruction and despair left in the wake of the atomic bomb. Owen, in "Dulce Et Decorum Est", utilizes gritty and vivid language to depict the gruesome realities faced by soldiers, making the reader experience the horror firsthand.
Regarding atmosphere, "Hiroshima" creates a somber and melancholic mood, evoking a sense of grief and tragedy. In contrast, "Dulce Et Decorum Est" evokes a tense and disturbing atmosphere, filled with tension, fear, and the chaos of war.
Both poems differ in terms of verse structure. "Hiroshima" is written in free verse, without a consistent rhyme or meter, allowing the poet to convey the chaotic and fragmented nature of the subject. "Dulce Et Decorum Est," however, follows a regular rhyme scheme and meter, utilizing a traditional poetic structure to emphasize the seriousness of the message.
As for imagery, "Hiroshima" uses vivid and sensory descriptions to illustrate the devastation caused by the atomic bomb. Clifton employs metaphor and simile to evoke strong visual and emotional imagery. In "Dulce Et Decorum Est," Owen incorporates vivid and grotesque imagery to create intense and haunting visuals that intensify the gravity of the poem's themes.
In terms of subject/theme, "Hiroshima" explores the consequences of war, the atrocities committed, and the loss of innocence. "Dulce Et Decorum Est" addresses the disillusionment with war propaganda and questions the honor and glory associated with fighting for one's country.
To summarize, "Hiroshima" by Angela Clifton and "Dulce Et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen share similarities in their focus on the horrors of war but differ in their perspectives, themes, diction, atmosphere, verse structure, imagery, and subject matter. By analyzing these elements, we can gain a deeper understanding of the poems and appreciate the unique ways in which they convey their messages.