Compare and contrast the conflicts faced by Orwell in “Shooting an Elephant” to those faced by Gideon in “No Witchcraft for Sale.” To what unique revelation does Orwell’s position as a police officer lead him? How can Gideon’s ultimate decision not to share his knowledge be interpreted as an act of rebellion and an assertion of the dignity and worth of his culture?
This site may help you write your essay.
http://www.eslbee.com/compcont.htm
To compare and contrast the conflicts faced by Orwell in "Shooting an Elephant" and Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale," you will need to analyze the central themes, motifs, and character developments in both stories. Here's how you can approach it:
1. Read both stories: Familiarize yourself with the plots, characters, settings, and conflicts presented in each story.
2. Identify the conflicts: In "Shooting an Elephant," Orwell faces an internal conflict between his true feelings and his duties as an imperial police officer in colonial Burma. This conflict is also connected to his external conflict with the Burmese people and their resentment towards British rule.
In "No Witchcraft for Sale," Gideon faces a cultural and moral conflict within himself. He possesses sacred knowledge of a healing plant, but he must decide whether to share it with the outsiders (the Farquars) or protect it as a tradition within his culture.
3. Analyze Orwell's unique revelation: Consider the impact of Orwell's role as a police officer in his conflict. As he is expected to maintain authority and uphold British rule, Orwell feels compelled to shoot the elephant to assert dominance and preserve his image. However, through this experience, he realizes the oppressive nature of imperialism and the loss of personal autonomy it brings.
4. Evaluate Gideon's decision as an act of rebellion: Gideon's ultimate choice not to share his knowledge can be interpreted as an act of rebellion against the Farquars and a assertion of the dignity and worth of his culture. By protecting the secret of the healing plant, Gideon maintains the integrity and exclusivity of his cultural heritage, resisting the outsiders' attempt to exploit and commodify it.
5. Consider the significance of culture and identity: Both stories explore the clash between different cultures and the consequences of cultural dominance. Orwell's conflict highlights the dehumanizing effects of imperialism, while Gideon's conflict emphasizes the preservation of indigenous knowledge and traditions against cultural appropriation.
By examining these points, you can compare and contrast the conflicts in both stories and explore the unique revelations and acts of rebellion demonstrated by Orwell and Gideon.
In comparing and contrasting the conflicts faced by Orwell in "Shooting an Elephant" and Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale," it becomes evident that both characters grapple with inner moral dilemmas and external pressures related to cultural dynamics.
In "Shooting an Elephant," Orwell, serving as a police officer in British-occupied Burma, confronts the conflict between his personal beliefs and the expectations placed upon him by the imperial regime. Orwell feels compelled to shoot an elephant rampaging through a village, not out of necessity or personal desire, but to avoid appearing weak in front of the local population. This conflict reflects the oppressive nature of colonialism, where the British authority expects Orwell to maintain control and dominance over the Burmese people.
On the other hand, Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale" faces a different kind of conflict. As a native African healer, he possesses knowledge of a plant that has healing properties, which the white family he works for wishes to exploit for profit. Gideon is torn between providing necessary aid to their child and preserving the sacred knowledge of his culture. Ultimately, Gideon refuses to share this knowledge with the family, allowing his decision to be interpreted as an act of rebellion and an assertion of the dignity and worth of his culture. By withholding his knowledge, he maintains the integrity and sanctity of African traditions rather than letting them be commodified by the colonial mindset.
Orwell's unique revelation as a police officer is that the oppressive nature of imperialism not only subjugates the colonized but also dehumanizes the colonizer. While Orwell initially acquiesces to the expectations of the imperial regime, his experience shooting the elephant leads him to question the moral decay engendered by colonization. He realizes that the British authority, represented by himself, is more of an instrument of oppression than a benevolent force. Thus, his position as a police officer leads him to recognize the dehumanizing effects of imperialism on both the oppressed and the oppressor.
In contrast, Gideon's decision not to share his knowledge can be viewed as an act of rebellion and an assertion of the dignity and worth of his culture. By refusing to let an important aspect of his culture be appropriated and exploited, Gideon demonstrates a defiance against the power dynamics of the colonial era. His choice underscores the value of preserving one's heritage and maintaining agency even in the face of colonial subjugation. In this act of resistance, Gideon upholds the dignity and worth of his culture by refusing to allow it to be devalued or diluted by external forces.
In summary, both Orwell in "Shooting an Elephant" and Gideon in "No Witchcraft for Sale" grapple with conflicts arising from the cultural dynamics of imperialism. Orwell's unique revelation as a police officer is that both the colonized and the colonizer are dehumanized under such oppressive systems. Gideon, in his decision not to share his sacred knowledge, asserts the rebellion and dignity of his culture, refusing to let it be commodified and devalued.