WFE question
it be right for jcob & kinko to inform cmel son?
i think it be because they not want him to get killed and that be only other option.
who be blamed? uncle al or agust? for that rosie complication that happen in chapter 15? al for buying elephant in first place or agust not traing her properly or both?
i think both be because they be abusive not handle wth love.
I agree with you.
thanks very much ms. sue :)
To answer your first question about whether it is right for Jacob and Kinko to inform Cmel's son, the answer depends on the specific context and situation. However, let's break down how to approach this question:
1. Consider the moral implications: One way to evaluate the rightness or wrongness of informing Cmel's son is by considering the moral implications. Ask yourself if it is morally justifiable to potentially endanger someone's life by informing them. Consider the possible consequences and weigh them against the intention of protecting him.
2. Analyze the available options: Assess the reasons why Jacob and Kinko want to inform Cmel's son. Are there any other options available that might be less risky but still achieve their goal of protecting him? Consider possible alternatives or solutions that could be explored.
3. Consider the ethical principles involved: Reflect on ethical principles such as honesty, beneficence (doing good), non-maleficence (avoiding harm), autonomy (individual choices), and justice (fairness). Evaluate the situation from these ethical perspectives and try to determine if informing Cmel's son aligns with these principles.
As for your second question about who should be blamed for the Rosie complication in Chapter 15, it seems there are two possible parties involved: Uncle Al and Agust. Here's how you can approach this:
1. Assess Uncle Al's role: Consider Uncle Al's decision to purchase an elephant. Evaluate whether it was a responsible and appropriate choice, taking into account factors such as his resources, knowledge, and the suitability of keeping an elephant as a pet. Assess whether his decision could be seen as reckless or neglectful.
2. Evaluate Agust's responsibility: Examine Agust's role in training Rosie. Determine if he failed to adequately train or handle Rosie, leading to the complications described in Chapter 15. Assess whether his actions or lack thereof contributed to the abusive treatment of Rosie or if he displayed negligence in fulfilling his responsibilities.
3. Consider shared blame: Assess whether both Uncle Al and Agust hold some responsibility for the situation. Determine if their combined actions, or lack thereof, resulted in the abuse and mishandling of Rosie.
Ultimately, the question of who should be blamed for the situation in Chapter 15 may have subjective elements. It can also be a matter of interpretation, and different readers may assign the blame differently based on their understanding of the characters and the events that unfolded.