who is most likely to have A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW ABOUT RESCUING MARNE ANIMALS? I PUT A PERSON WHO SELLS SEAL FUR FOR A LIVING OTHER OPTIONS ARE A PERSON WHO WORKS AT AN AQUARIUM A PERSON WHO STUDIES THE OCEAN AND ITS CREATURES A MARINE MAMMAL TRAINER

The person most likely to have a different point of view about rescuing marine animals would be the person who sells seal fur for a living. This is because their livelihood is directly tied to the sale and use of seal fur, which may create a conflict of interest when it comes to supporting efforts aimed at rescuing and protecting these animals.

To determine the person with a different point of view, we can compare the perspectives of each option:

1. Person who sells seal fur for a living: Their primary concern is likely to be the economic aspect of their job. They might argue that hunting seals for their fur is a traditional practice and a vital industry that supports their livelihoods and the local economy. As a result, they may oppose efforts to rescue or protect marine animals, including seals, as it might undermine their business.

2. Person who works at an aquarium: This individual is more likely to support the rescue and conservation efforts for marine animals. Their work involves educating people about marine life and promoting conservation. They may advocate for captive breeding programs, habitat protection, and rescue initiatives.

3. Person who studies the ocean and its creatures: Someone who studies the ocean and its creatures, such as a marine biologist or scientist, is more likely to prioritize the welfare of marine animals. They would bring scientific knowledge and expertise to support conservation initiatives and would probably advocate for rescue efforts.

4. Marine mammal trainer: While a marine mammal trainer's job involves working closely with marine animals, they may have a different perspective than someone who studies the ocean. Their primary concern is likely to be the benefits of training and interacting with marine animals for educational purposes or entertainment. They may see these animals as trainable and argue that their interactions contribute to public awareness and conservation efforts.

It's important to note that this analysis is based on general assumptions and doesn't account for individual opinions or variations within each group. People's perspectives can vary widely even within the same occupation or circumstance.