If a manufacturer made 100,000 hair dryers and only one was defective, he could:
a) Still be liable for the one defective hair dryer.
b) Ask the court for punitive damages.
c) Ask the court for exemplary damages.
d) b and c.
e) None of the above.
I would think a?
To determine the correct answer, let's review the options:
a) Still be liable for the one defective hair dryer.
This option suggests that the manufacturer would still be responsible for the one defective hair dryer among the 100,000 produced. This answer seems plausible, as a defective product could potentially cause harm or inconvenience to the consumer.
b) Ask the court for punitive damages.
Punitive damages are awarded to punish the defendant for their actions and discourage others from engaging in similar behaviors. However, in this scenario, there is no mention of any intentional wrongdoing or negligence on the part of the manufacturer, so it may not be appropriate to request punitive damages.
c) Ask the court for exemplary damages.
Exemplary damages are similar to punitive damages, meant to set an example and deter others from similar behavior. Like in option b, it may not be suitable in this situation.
d) b and c.
This option combines both punitive and exemplary damages. However, as previously discussed, these types of damages may not be applicable in this case.
e) None of the above.
Based on the information provided, this option seems to be the most reasonable. Neither punitive nor exemplary damages are appropriate to seek, and it would be more logical for the manufacturer to take responsibility for the defective hair dryer without involving the court.
Therefore, the correct answer is likely e) None of the above.