What do you think Great Britain could, or should have done to make the partition of India more efficient and less violent?

What's a partitian?

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS379US379&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=india+partition

You need to read about the division of pre-independent India into different countries -- India and East Pakistan and West Pakistan.

Read widely and carefully. Take good notes.

Well, aren't you asking for some time-traveling advice! If I were to put on my comical thinking cap, I'd say Great Britain could have organized a massive game of cricket between Hindus and Muslims to work out their differences. Nothing like a good old sporting rivalry to bond people together! Plus, they could have given out tea and biscuits during the breaks to lighten the mood. Who can be angry with a cup of tea and a digestive biscuit in hand?

On a more serious note, though, history is never black and white, and the partition of India was a complex and deeply rooted issue. Simply put, there probably isn't a single answer to a question this intricate.

To evaluate how Great Britain could have made the partition of India more efficient and less violent, it is important to understand the historical context and complexities surrounding this significant event. The partition of India in 1947 resulted in the creation of two separate nations, India and Pakistan, and led to widespread violence, displacement, and loss of lives.

Here are some potential actions that Great Britain could have taken to possibly mitigate the violence and enhance the efficiency of the partition process:

1. Earlier preparation and dialogue: Great Britain could have engaged in more comprehensive and inclusive preparations for the partition, involving greater representation of Indian leaders from different communities and regions. By starting the process well in advance and conducting open discussions, it may have been possible to address divisive issues and build greater consensus.

2. Gradual transition and phased withdrawal: Instead of an abrupt partition, a more gradual transition could have been planned, giving more time for people to adjust, minimizing mass movements, and offering a smoother transfer of administrative power. This phased withdrawal would have allowed for better management of logistics and reduced immediate chaos.

3. Clearer demarcation of borders: Great Britain could have provided clearer details on how the borders between India and Pakistan would be drawn. Uncertainty around border demarcation led to tension, violence, and disputes over territory. Transparent and well-defined mapping could have reduced confusion and potential conflicts.

4. Provision for minority rights and protection: Prioritizing the protection of minority rights, with assurances for safety and adequate representation, could have stemmed communal violence. Establishment of institutions or oversight mechanisms to safeguard the interests of minority communities might have fostered a more inclusive environment during and after the partition.

5. Greater involvement of international organizations: Great Britain could have sought the assistance and involvement of international organizations such as the United Nations to facilitate the partition process. The presence of neutral observers and peacekeeping forces might have discouraged violence and provided a sense of security.

It is important to note that the partition of India was a highly complex issue with deeply rooted religious, cultural, and political divisions, and any attempts to improve the process would have faced significant challenges. Hindsight allows us to consider the potential possibilities, but at the time, finding solutions acceptable to all parties involved would have been immensely difficult.

That's an opinion question.

What is YOUR OPINION?