WRITE AN ARTICLE FOR A SCHOOL MAGAZINE IN WHICH YOU HIGHLIGHT THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSED SCHEME [HAVING A SCHOOL COURT]:
Fellow students! Big changes are on the horizon. Our headteacher, Mrs Rodriguez, has finally decided to tackle the antisocial behavior among many of the pupils in this school. Her plan is to set up a 'School court'. The court will be run by a group of six pupils who will be judges to their fellow students who who have behavior problems. Some people think its a great idea while others cant even sleep at night because they're so worried about the scheme!
So, to the guys who are worried out there, lets look on the bright side! Firstly, you must all admit that its a new idea. We all know that the current method of dealing with troublemakers (kicking them out of school for a couple of days) is definitely not working. The school court method is a proactive way to tackle behavior problems and moreover, it has been proved extremely effective in other secondary schools. The scheme also promotes teamwork as the judges will be working together to make decisions. Finally, lets face it people: No one knows and understands teenagers better than teenagers themselves!
On the other side, a number of concerns about this new idea have been raised. One problem with the plan is that it could lead to favoritism. Although the judges agree to remain unbiased at all times, we've got to remember that they are young people at the end of the day. How many teenagers do you know that never tell a lie? So, the judges could be loyal towards their friends or fellow students. This will promote further, such as the judges themselves getting bullied due to the sanctions they hand out, or even blackmailed into making unfair decisions. So, you see this new method of dealing with antisocial behavior could actually lead to even more bad behavior in our school.
To conclude, in my opinion Mrs Rodriguez's plan to launch the school court method is quite risky as it could all fall apart and fail to fulfill its purpose. But on the other hand, you never know, it might be the answer to a lot of the schools problems..
Thanks for the help. Any suggestions would be great.
a 'School court'. -- Why the quotation marks and capital S?
who will be judges to their fellow students who who have -- "judges to ?? "who who" -- ??
And those are just in the first 4 lines.
Please read over your writing very carefully -- or better yet, have someone else read it aloud to you. Read it one sentence at a time, from the end to the beginning.
What do you find?
the court might be biased but if the training given to young people as judges was effective, this would not happen!!
Title: The Pros and Cons of the Proposed School Court Scheme
Introduction:
In an effort to tackle antisocial behavior among students, our headteacher, Mrs Rodriguez, has come up with an innovative solution: the introduction of a school court. While this proposed scheme has generated mixed reactions among students, it is crucial to evaluate both the advantages and disadvantages before forming a definitive opinion.
Advantages of the School Court Scheme:
1. Proactive Approach: Unlike the traditional method of temporarily suspending troublemakers from school, the school court offers a proactive approach to address behavioral issues. By involving a group of student judges, it empowers students to take ownership of their actions, fostering personal growth and accountability.
2. Effectiveness: The success of similar court systems in other secondary schools provides evidence of the scheme's potential effectiveness. By utilizing peer influence, students may be more receptive to the judgments and advice of their fellow classmates, leading to positive changes in behavior.
3. Teamwork and Collaboration: The school court promotes teamwork among the selected student judges. This collaborative effort allows students to work together, discuss cases, and make decisions collectively. By involving students in decision-making processes, it can empower them to shape their own learning environment.
4. Peer Understanding: No one understands teenagers better than teenagers themselves. By involving student judges, the court ensures that those handling behavioral issues have a firsthand understanding of the challenges and pressures students face. This perspective could lead to fairer and more empathetic judgments.
Disadvantages of the School Court Scheme:
1. Potential for Favoritism: One major concern with the school court scheme is the possibility of favoritism. Despite the judges agreeing to remain unbiased, their youthful nature makes them susceptible to personal loyalties or friendships. This could lead to potential unfair treatment and decisions being made based on personal biases.
2. Vulnerability to Bullying: The student judges may encounter increased vulnerability to bullying due to the sanctions they administer. Bullies may target them for making judgments against their friends or allies, potentially leading to negative consequences for the judges and hampering the effectiveness of the court system.
3. Risk of Coercion: Unethical individuals may attempt to manipulate the student judges into making unfair decisions through blackmail or threats. This coercion would compromise the integrity of the school court and undermine its purpose of addressing antisocial behavior.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the proposed school court scheme presents both advantages and disadvantages. While it offers a proactive approach, effectiveness in addressing behavioral issues, and peer understanding, concerns regarding favoritism, vulnerability to bullying, and risk of coercion should not be overlooked. It is vital for Mrs Rodriguez and the school community to carefully weigh the potential benefits against these risks before implementing the scheme. By addressing these concerns and establishing appropriate safeguards, the school court could be a valuable tool in fostering a positive and supportive school environment.