i also not get this one which be talk about 'madness' as social experience (phenonmenan) compare experience of madness with other kinds eg. social dev iates.
We don't know how the narrator acts with people other than John and Jenny. Most madness affects many others as they interact, or don't interact with other people. This narrator's madness is confined to her own mind.
thanks very much ms. sue :)
You're very welcome, Mohammad.
To understand the concept of "madness" as a social experience and how it compares to other kinds of social deviance, it's important to explore several aspects and perspectives.
Firstly, "madness" refers to a state of mind characterized by severe mental illness or disorder, often resulting in abnormal thoughts, behaviors, and emotions. It is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that has been studied from various perspectives, including psychology, sociology, and anthropology.
In terms of the social experience of madness, it can be understood as a socially constructed concept. Society plays a significant role in labeling and defining what is considered "mad" or mentally ill. The experience of madness can be influenced by cultural and societal norms, values, and expectations. This social construction of madness shapes how individuals are perceived, treated, and understood within a given society.
When comparing the social experience of madness with other kinds of social deviance, it is essential to consider the following points:
1. Social Definitions: Both madness and other forms of social deviance are socially constructed and depend on the prevailing norms and values of a particular society. The categorization of certain behaviors as "madness" or other forms of deviance is influenced by cultural, historical, and social contexts.
2. Stigmatization: Both madness and social deviance can lead to stigmatization and marginalization of individuals who display unconventional or disruptive behaviors. People labeled as "mad" or socially deviant often face discrimination, prejudice, and social exclusion due to the negative perceptions associated with their behavior or condition.
3. Power Dynamics: Power dynamics play a role in the social responses to madness and social deviance. The psychiatric system, law enforcement, and other social institutions have the authority to classify, diagnose, and regulate individuals who are considered "mad" or socially deviant. These power dynamics can shape the treatment, control, and management of those individuals.
4. Social Impact: Madness, as a social experience, can have a significant impact not only on the individual experiencing it but also on their broader social networks and communities. The disruptions caused by madness or social deviance can challenge social norms, provoke fear or discomfort, and prompt debates about the boundaries of acceptability and deviance within a society.
In summary, madness as a social experience involves the social construction of mental illness, societal responses, and the impact on individuals and communities. Comparing this experience with other forms of social deviance highlights the role of social definitions, stigmatization, power dynamics, and the broader social impact. Understanding and comparing these experiences require a multidisciplinary approach that considers psychological, sociological, and anthropological perspectives.