In the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that _____.


My answer1.)the Necessary and Proper Clause gave the federal government broad rights not mentioned in the Constitution

2.)federal government could not create a national bank

3.)the Bill of Rights implies a constitutional right to privacy

4.)racial segregation of public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment

I disagree. It looks like you should read your text materials and stop guessing, Abigail/Paige.

I'm not guessing, and why did you put Abigail/paige??

The correct answer is 1.) the Necessary and Proper Clause gave the federal government broad rights not mentioned in the Constitution.

To find this answer, you can review the case McCulloch v. Maryland. This case was decided by the Supreme Court in 1819 and dealt with the constitutionality of the Second Bank of the United States. When trying to understand a Supreme Court decision, it is important to read the court's opinion.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the majority opinion. In his opinion, Marshall argued that the Constitution grants implied powers to the federal government under the Necessary and Proper Clause, found in Article I, Section 8. He stated that even though the power to create a national bank is not expressly mentioned in the Constitution, it is necessary and proper for the federal government to have such powers in order to carry out its enumerated powers.

Therefore, the Supreme Court held that the federal government had the authority to create a national bank under the implied powers granted by the Necessary and Proper Clause. So, the answer to your question is that in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that the Necessary and Proper Clause gave the federal government broad rights not mentioned in the Constitution.