help with this sentence
A hot dog is a cylindrical thing a mob made out of certain sorts of dead animals, usually not hippopotamuses or polar bears.
a.too broad b.too narrow
c.attempt to persuade d.too vague
e.use of negatives f.circular
As a definition, I'd say that the sentence is too broad. It's also too vague.
To determine the answer, you can break down the sentence and analyze each option provided:
Option a) Too broad: The sentence is describing a hot dog as a "cylindrical thing made out of certain sorts of dead animals." This definition is overly general and does not specify any specific details about what constitutes a hot dog.
Option b) Too narrow: The sentence does not limit the definition of a hot dog to a specific subset or subset of characteristics, so it is not too narrow.
Option c) Attempt to persuade: The sentence does not appear to be trying to persuade or convince the reader of anything. It is simply providing a statement about hot dogs.
Option d) Too vague: The sentence lacks specificity and clarity in its description of a hot dog, so it could be considered too vague.
Option e) Use of negatives: The sentence includes the use of negatives when it states, "usually not hippopotamuses or polar bears." This use of negatives adds some specificity to the description, but it does not significantly affect the overall classification of the sentence.
Option f) Circular: The sentence does not exhibit circular reasoning or logic, so it is not circular.
Considering the above analysis, the most fitting answers appear to be too broad and too vague.