Since the 1970s, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as prohibiting the government from making "_____" distinctions between people.
unreasonable
=racial
reasonable
unnecessary
I agree.
reasonable
unnecessary
It's unreasonable
theze nuts
unreasonable
To find the answer to this statement, we need to understand the interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause by the Supreme Court. The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Supreme Court has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause to prohibit the government from making "unreasonable" distinctions between people. This means that the government cannot treat people differently in a way that lacks a rational basis or is unrelated to a legitimate government interest.
Therefore, the correct answer to the statement is "unreasonable." The government is not allowed to make unreasonable distinctions, such as treating people differently without a valid reason.
In summary, the Supreme Court has interpreted the Equal Protection Clause as prohibiting the government from making "unreasonable" distinctions between people.