According to Peter Saundry, there is no true universal code of ethics because standards of conduct vary from place-to-place and time-to-time
What makes Peter Saundry an authority?
Why is this considered science?
What is your question?
BobPursley answered this already.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1313181934
To address this question, we first need to understand who Peter Saundry is and the context of his statement. Peter Saundry is a professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. As an expert in this field, he likely made this statement in the context of discussing ethical considerations in environmental studies or related disciplines.
Now, with regards to the question itself, it is true that there is no universally agreed upon code of ethics that applies to all individuals, cultures, and time periods. Ethical standards are shaped by various factors, including cultural norms, religious beliefs, historical and societal context, and individual values.
The concept of ethics is subjective, and different societies or cultures may have different ethical norms and values. For example, what may be considered ethical in one culture might be seen as unacceptable in another. Additionally, ethical standards can evolve over time, reflecting changes in societal values and evolving perspectives on moral principles.
To ascertain whether there is a universal code of ethics, we would need to examine the philosophies and ethical frameworks proposed by various moral thinkers over time. There are several ethical theories, such as utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, and ethical relativism, each offering different perspectives on what constitutes ethical behavior. However, even within these theories, there are disagreements and variations regarding specific ethical principles.
Ultimately, ethics is a complex and dynamic subject that varies across different contexts, cultures, and time periods. It is important to engage in thoughtful, open-minded discussions and consider multiple perspectives when exploring questions of ethics to appreciate the nuances and variations that exist.