
posted by bobpursley

posted by Steve
Respond to this Question
Similar Questions

math
Which statement is logically equivalent to ~a ¨ b? a ¨ ~b b ¨ ~a ~b ¨ a ~b ¨ ~a 
Geometry
A conditional statement is always logically equivalent to its a.) contrapositive b.) converse c.) conjunction d.) inverse 
Geometry
In logic, which of the following is said to be logically equivalent to the original statement? a.) converse b.) inverse c.) negation d.)contrapositive 
math
Question: Use logical equivalnces to show that the propositions !p > (q>r) and q > (p v r) are logically equivalent. I AM SO DAMN CONFUSED! I tried to solve !p > (q > r) first and I only got to !p > (!q v 
Discrete math
Question: Use logical equivalnces to show that the propositions !p > (q>r) and q > (p v r) are logically equivalent. I AM SO DAMN CONFUSED! I tried to solve !p > (q > r) first and I only got to !p > (!q v 
math
If Tom buys a red skateboard, then Anne buys pink inline skates." Which statement below is logically equivalent? 
Logic / Discrete Mathematics
Show that "¬p Λ q is logically equivalent to p → ¬q" . I'm not sure if the conditional identity is correct, but what I did was I negated the whole second condition and it immediately became equal to the first? Please 
discrete mathematics with applications
Determine which of the following pairs of statements forms are logically equivalent. Justify your answer using truth tables and include a few words of explanation. Read "t" to be a tautology and "c" to be a contradiction: 26. 
Math
1. 0.24% as a decimal? Is it 0.0024? 2. 135% as a decimal? Is it 1.35? 3. 1/5% as a decimal? Is it 0.2? 4. fraction equivalent to 0.75% is... Is it 3/4? 5. mixed number equivalent to 420% is... Is it 4 1/5? 6. percent equivalent 
Philosophy
First, translate the following statement pair into the symbols of propositional logic (use the letters P and R) (a) We will have a picnic unless it happens to rain (b) We won’t have a picnic only if it happens to rain Second,