What conclusion can you draw about Samuel Pepys from his account of the Great Fire of London? A. He maintained relations with all social strate. B He became the spokesperson of the aristocracy. C he felt responsible for organizing rescue issions. I think it is C but am not sure.
I agree.
thank you.
You're welcome.
To determine the conclusion that can be drawn about Samuel Pepys from his account of the Great Fire of London, it is helpful to look at specific details and actions portrayed in his writings. If you have read or analyzed Pepys' account, you can identify evidence to support each option and then choose the most supported conclusion.
To find evidence for each option, you can review Pepys' account of the Great Fire of London, either by reading his diary or any other historical record that includes his perspective. Pay attention to his interactions with people from various social classes, any statements or actions that suggest his role as a spokesperson for the aristocracy, and any indications that he took responsibility for organizing rescue missions.
Once you have gathered evidence, consider which option is most strongly supported. For example, if you find that Pepys had extensive interactions with people from all social strata during the fire and maintained relations with them, then option A would be the most suitable conclusion. On the other hand, if you discover that Pepys consistently represented the views and interests of the aristocracy during the event, option B would be the likely conclusion. Similarly, if his account indicates a personal sense of responsibility for organizing rescue missions, option C would be the most valid choice.
Therefore, to determine whether option C is the correct conclusion, carefully review the available evidence within Pepys' account, consider the context and implications of his actions, and make an informed judgment based on the most strongly supported option.