which paragraph of the article best supports the authors argument against clear cutting?

To determine which paragraph of the article best supports the author's argument against clear cutting, you will need to review the article and look for the paragraph that presents evidence or reasoning that opposes clear cutting. Here's how you can go about doing that:

1. Read the article: Start by reading the entire article carefully. Look for information related to clear cutting and the author's viewpoint on the subject.

2. Identify the author's argument: Pay attention to the main points that the author makes against clear cutting. Look for statements that express concerns, consequences, or alternative solutions related to this logging practice.

3. Analyze supporting paragraphs: Look for paragraphs that specifically present evidence, facts, examples, or logical reasoning that directly support the author's argument against clear cutting. These paragraphs may discuss the environmental impact, loss of biodiversity, soil erosion, or any other negative consequences related to clear cutting.

4. Evaluate relevance and strength: Once you identify paragraphs that seem to oppose clear cutting, assess their relevance to the author's argument. Evaluate the strength of the evidence or reasoning provided in those paragraphs to determine which one best supports the author's viewpoint.

By going through these steps and engaging in a critical analysis of the article, you will be able to identify the paragraph that best supports the author's argument against clear cutting.