a survey of 10 film historians, half voted for Nosferatu as the greatest vampire film ever made, and the other half voted for Dracula. However, when asked which lead vampire character they considered more charismatic, all of the film critics chose Dracula over Nosferatu.

Based on the information above, it must be true that for some film critics, their feelings about the charisma of the lead character (Points : 1)
is the least important factor they consider when comparing two films
is the most important factor they consider when comparing two films
is not the most important factor they consider when comparing two films
is the only factor they consider when comparing two films

I would choose:

"is not the most important factor they consider when comparing two films "

I'll be glad to check your answer.

Please do not post any more questions until you've answered my queries on your previous logic questions.

is not the most important factor they consider when compairing two films

Based on the given information, it can be concluded that for some film critics, their feelings about the charisma of the lead vampire character is not the most important factor they consider when comparing two films. This can be inferred from the fact that despite half of the film historians voting for Nosferatu as the greatest vampire film ever made, all of them chose Dracula as the more charismatic lead vampire character. This suggests that they considered other factors, such as plot, context, cinematography, and other elements, along with charisma when comparing the two films. Therefore, charisma is not the most important factor for these film critics when making film comparisons.