the debate over the powers of the presidency is essentially a debate
a. about article III of the constitution
b. between supporters of a strong presidency and supporters of a weak presidency
c. about the system of checks and balances
d. about the electoral college system
b
First, eliminate obvious wrong answers. Then pick key words for remaining answers and search for them up in Google (or some other search engine).
Although this is not my area of expertise, I did so to arrive at an answer. You can do the same.
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
To answer this question, we need to understand the topic at hand - the debate over the powers of the presidency. This is essentially a debate between different perspectives on the strength or weakness of the presidency. So, the correct answer is b. between supporters of a strong presidency and supporters of a weak presidency.
To arrive at this answer, you could start by thinking about the key arguments made by those who support a strong presidency and those who support a weak presidency. Supporters of a strong presidency often argue that the president should have extensive powers to effectively lead the country and respond to crises. On the other hand, supporters of a weak presidency may emphasize the importance of checks and balances, limiting the power of the president to prevent abuse or tyranny. By understanding these different perspectives, you can conclude that the debate is largely between those who advocate for a strong presidency and those who advocate for a weak presidency.