Which of the following is most likely to persuade the reader ?

a.Describe your reader's solution first, explain why it won't work,and then go on to describe your own solution.
b.Ignore your opponent's solution and just concentrate on your own.
c.Describe your own solution first.Then briefly say why your reader's idia won't work.
d.Go back and forth between solutions , contrasting step by step.

Let us know what YOU THINK the right answer is.

Probably A. But got confused which one is the best answer , A or D. If I not mistaking , I A is the best answer.

To determine which option is most likely to persuade the reader, you can analyze the strategies used in each option and consider their effectiveness in addressing the reader's perspective. Let's break down each option:

a. Describe your reader's solution first, explain why it won't work, and then go on to describe your own solution:
This option acknowledges the reader's solution, which can help establish credibility and show that their opinion is valued. By explaining why their solution won't work, you can effectively highlight the limitations and create a need for an alternative solution. Finally, providing your own solution can showcase its advantages and how it addresses the reader's concerns. This approach aims to persuade the reader through logical reasoning and presenting a well-thought-out alternative.

b. Ignore your opponent's solution and just concentrate on your own:
This option does not explicitly address the reader's perspective or acknowledge their solution. Ignoring the opponent's solution may come across as dismissive or arrogant, potentially alienating the reader. Without considering the merits and limitations of the reader's idea, this approach may be less persuasive as it overlooks the need to build a common ground or address potential concerns the reader might have.

c. Describe your own solution first. Then briefly say why your reader's idea won't work:
This option focuses primarily on presenting your own solution, which may limit understanding and consideration of the reader's perspective. By not providing detailed reasoning as to why the reader's idea won't work, it might appear as a subjective dismissal rather than a well-reasoned counter-argument. It could be less persuasive as it lacks an in-depth analysis of the reader's solution.

d. Go back and forth between solutions, contrasting step by step:
This option involves contrasting the solutions step-by-step, which allows for a detailed examination of both perspectives. By comparing and contrasting the solutions, you can demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each option, offering a more comprehensive evaluation. This approach encourages critical thinking and helps the reader understand the advantages of your solution over the opponent's. This method is likely to be more persuasive as it provides a balanced analysis and systematically addresses both perspectives.

In conclusion, option d (Go back and forth between solutions, contrasting step by step) is most likely to persuade the reader because it presents a more thorough examination of both solutions, allowing for a nuanced comparison and a logical argument in favor of your own solution.