Case: Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Question:
Should a person with a disability lose ADA protection because the disability is being corrected by medication? Was the UPS regarded Murphy as being disable when it determined he was not certifiable un ...there is moreshow problemShould a person with a disability lose ADA protection because the disability is being corrected by medication? Was the UPS regarded Murphy as being disable when it determined he was not certifiable under DOT regulations? Do you agree with the court's decision?
Again, these questions need to be answered with your opinions.
Since this is not my area of expertise, I searched Google under the key words "Murphy Parcel" to get these possible sources:
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1992.ZS.html
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=97-1992
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
To answer your questions, I will provide a summary of the case Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., and then explain how you can find the information to form your own opinion.
Case Summary:
In the case of Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Robert Murphy, a UPS driver, was diagnosed with hypertension, which is considered a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The medication Murphy was prescribed effectively controlled his blood pressure. However, UPS required drivers to obtain a certification of medical fitness for duty under the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations. When Murphy failed to obtain the required certification due to his hypertension, UPS regarded him as not being disabled under the ADA. Consequently, Murphy claimed that UPS violated the ADA by regarding him as not disabled and requiring the certification.
Finding Information:
To determine whether a person with a disability loses ADA protection when their disability is being corrected by medication, you can research the ADA and related legal interpretations. Start by reviewing the actual text of the ADA, including Title I, which specifically addresses employment practices. The ADA is a federal law, so you can find it on various government websites such as the official ADA website or the United States Department of Justice website.
Additionally, you can look for legal opinions and summaries related to this specific case, such as court decisions or analysis by legal experts. Websites like Justia, FindLaw, or trusted news sources may provide summaries and commentary on the Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case. By reading multiple sources, you can gain a comprehensive understanding of the court's decision.
Forming an Opinion:
Forming an opinion about the court's decision is subjective and depends on your personal interpretation and values. It's essential to consider both sides of the argument and evaluate the legal reasoning behind the decision. Reflect on the language and intent of the ADA, the specific facts of the case, and any relevant precedents that may have influenced the court's decision.
Furthermore, you can examine other legal cases that have addressed similar circumstances or relevant legal principles. By researching and analyzing a variety of sources, you can develop an informed opinion on whether you agree or disagree with the court's decision in the Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc. case.
Remember, it is always advisable to consult with legal professionals or experts for accurate and comprehensive insights on legal matters.