You are writing to a reader who favors a different solution than the one you recommend. Which of the following is MOST likely to persuade the reader?
A. Describe your reader's solution first, explain why it won't work, and then go on to describe your own solution.
B. Ignore your opponent's solution and just concentrate on your own.
C. Describe your own solution first. Then briefly say why your reader's idea won't work.
D. Go back and forth between solutions, contrasting step by step.
The most likely option to persuade a reader who favors a different solution than the one you recommend is option A: Describe your reader's solution first, explain why it won't work, and then go on to describe your own solution.
Explaining your reader's solution first demonstrates that you understand their perspective and shows respect for their ideas. By analyzing why their solution won't work, you have the opportunity to highlight potential flaws or limitations.
After addressing the reader's solution, you can then present your own solution as an alternative. This approach allows you to address any concerns or objections they may have and provide a clear explanation of why your solution is more effective or practical.
By using this method, you build credibility by acknowledging the reader's perspective, and then offer a logical and well-supported argument for your own solution. This approach increases the likelihood of persuading the reader and finding common ground between both solutions.