PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP !!! Do you think Napoleon brayed the french revolution when he became emperor. imagine that marat, roberspierre and danton bring napoleon to trail after his defeat at waterloo. make up a list of changes these leaders of the french revoulrion might bring against him. how might he defend his actions ?
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
WELL. i don't know how to put this in words :p . like . i don't know if he brayed the french revolution or something . please explain i need this by monday :/
Remember the motto of the French Revolution -- "Liberté, égalité, fraternité!" -- Liberty, equality, brotherhood.
Did Napoleon practice those ideals?
OH . THAT . and i don't think he did ... he was a follower of rousseau though :P .
The big question is -- what did Napoleon do? Why did he declare himself emperor?
The Revolution was fought for the ordinary people. Did Napoleon's actions support ordinary people?
He became much more of a tyrant than any rules of the ancien regime . and he looked back to the roan empire and copied the romans in many ways. like the first consul, which he adopted after he overthew the directory, was really a roman title. he crowned himself as emperor, because he wanted compete control of the country's affairs and he even had a secret police force, which could arrest and detain anyone for almost any reason. and he also knew he had to remain popular with his people in order to suceed and I am not sure if he supported the ordinary people or not .
PLEASE ANSWER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You haven't really answered the question.
If you want more help, please post a new question.
To answer your question, let's first review the scenario:
Imagine a situation where after Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo, three important figures of the French Revolution - Marat, Robespierre, and Danton - bring Napoleon to trial. In this hypothetical scenario, these leaders would likely make a list of changes against Napoleon, questioning his actions during his reign as Emperor.
Here are some potential changes they might bring against Napoleon:
1. Betrayal of the Revolutionary Ideals: They would argue that Napoleon abandoned the principles of the French Revolution, which aimed for equality, liberty, and fraternity. They might focus on the fact that Napoleon crowned himself Emperor, establishing a hereditary monarchy instead of the Republic envisioned during the revolution.
2. Suppression of Political Freedoms: The leaders could accuse Napoleon of restricting political freedoms such as freedom of speech, press, and assembly. They might highlight Napoleon's creation of censorship laws and his suppression of opposition voices to consolidate his power.
3. Expansionist and Imperialistic Policies: Napoleon's military campaigns, which sought to extend French territory and establish French hegemony in Europe, could be seen as a violation of the principles of the French Revolution. The leaders could argue that Napoleon's ambitions led to the unnecessary loss of countless lives and resources.
4. Curtailing of Civil Liberties: Napoleon's implementation of policies like the Napoleonic Code, which restricted individual rights and empowered the state, might be criticized. The leaders might point out that these policies eroded the gains made during the Revolution, such as the rights of women and religious minorities.
Now, let's consider how Napoleon might defend his actions in response to these charges:
1. Preservation of Order and Stability: Napoleon would likely argue that his ascent to power as Emperor was necessary to bring stability to France after years of turmoil during the Revolution. He could claim that the hierarchical structure provided the stability needed for the country to recover politically, economically, and socially.
2. Modernization and Reforms: Napoleon might highlight the various improvements he introduced, such as the Napoleonic Code, which brought legal uniformity across the nation. He could argue that his reforms aimed to streamline administration, strengthen centralized government, and promote economic prosperity.
3. Defense of France: Napoleon would likely defend his military campaigns, emphasizing his goal of safeguarding France's security and expanding its influence. He might argue that his actions were necessary to protect the revolutionary gains from external threats and to establish a stable Europe.
4. Popular Support: Napoleon might argue that he had significant popular support from the French people, especially considering his success on the battlefield. He could claim that his actions were in line with the will of the French citizens and that they benefited from the stability and prestige he provided.
It's important to note that this scenario is purely hypothetical. In reality, after Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo, he was exiled rather than facing a trial brought forth by the French Revolution leaders.