Theology

How can free will be compatible with predestination, when they hold two different views of creaiton?

Free will, that God created almost everything, and predestination, that he created everything.

Free will and predestination are not compatible. The concepts are also independent of whether there is a God or not. They have more to do with chaos theory and the uncertainty principle.

Whatever or whoever created the universe appears to have provided a set of physical laws that either allow free will, i.e, the ability to make decisions regarding the future, or to make unpredictable random choices, or to let the randomness happen. This differs greatly from the "predestination" promoted by Newtonian physics and certain religions.

Barbara, a devout Calvinistic Christian who believed in predestination, once explained this question to me. We were discussing this definition of predestination --
"the decree of God by which certain souls are foreordained to salvation."

She said that God had already foreordained whether she would go to Heaven or Hell. That was God's business. Her job was to live her life on Earth as well as she could. She had the free will to choose to do the right things.

Like many other issues in theology, this question of free will versus predestination is open to many interpretations.




Exercising free will alters the result.
Predestination means the result is fixed.
They are mutally exclusive.
Any attempt to describe a situation where both exist is illogical. In Barbras example, her actions have no reaction, she can choose "right", wrong, or no things to "do" and the result is the same. She has no "will" to express freely, as the predestination imlpies foreknowlege of all events leading to the result. She has reduced herself to an automoton, with all choices she thinks she is making "freely" already scripted.

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 113
asked by Magnu

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. reading skills

    1. Netta and Jim argued over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim had different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim were sharply split over the issue of free trade. 4. Netta and Jim refused to discuss the issue of free

    asked by Cassie on October 13, 2013
  2. reading

    1. Netta and Jim argued over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim had different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim were sharply split over the issue of free trade. 4. Netta and Jim refused to discuss the issue of free

    asked by Anonymous on February 19, 2013
  3. English

    This question is based on the following four sentences. 1. Netta and Jim wrangled over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim expressed different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim argued vociferously over the issue of

    asked by hector on January 12, 2020
  4. Reading Skills

    This question is based on the following four sentences. 1. Netta and Jim argued over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim had different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim were sharply split over the issue of free trade.

    asked by Emily on April 2, 2014
  5. Humanities

    In what ways does Darwin's theory of natural selection challenge traditional views? Is this theory compatible with a belief in a supreme being? If so, how?

    asked by Layla on February 9, 2009
  6. PHILOSOPHY

    What are your views on Free will and determinism? 1. The behavior of atoms is governed entirely by physical law. 2. Humans have free will. Do you accept both (1) and (2)

    asked by Rochelle on November 24, 2010
  7. US History

    Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, all are not free. When all are free, then we can look forward to that day when this city will be joined as one and this country and this great continent of Europe in a peaceful

    asked by Anonymous on April 11, 2018
  8. child development

    the continues development views hold that

    asked by john on April 19, 2016
  9. English

    In these four sentences, the word that’s most obviously a loaded word is? 1. Netta and Jim argued over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim had different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim were sharply split over the

    asked by Nikita on May 5, 2013
  10. english

    Netta and Jim argued over their views of free trade. 2. Netta and Jim had different views on free trade. 3. Netta and Jim were sharply split over the issue of free trade. 4. Netta and Jim refused to discuss the issue of free

    asked by liz on September 21, 2016

More Similar Questions