I was wondering if you could help me revise this?

Questions plague the mind of many readers of why exactly Tessie Hutchinson was stoned in Shirley Jackson’s, “The Lottery”. This gruesome tale tells of an innocent woman stoned in a small village of 300 people. In doing so, the community thought that their motives would aid them in they’re intentions to grow crops successfully. No one can relate to Jackson’s story but when South Africa banned her story, her only reply was "well at least they understand it". Mrs. Jackson’s vague statement opens up a realm of an depth analysis on what basis this torture was done and if banning of the document justified this or made them realize their mistake.
The sacrificial stoning of Tessie Hutchinson on the 27th day in June was carried out heedlessly. Keeping the tradition alive are two of the eldest men of the entire village, Old man Warner and Mr. Summers. Countless amounts of villagers reactions upon being reminded of the reason of the ritual, I believe are significantly coward like. The other villagers who did not appear to be bothered by the stoning of Tessie display actions are comparable to zombies, demonic, and brainwashed.
Normally, a loved one being put to death would make one utterly emotional but the Hutchinson family all showed no anguish. Nancy and Bill Jr. both being Tessie’s older children and the two create the impression that they are truly peppy neither of them have the black dot. “Nancy and Bill Jr. opened theirs at the same time, and both beamed and laughed, turning around to the crowd and holding their slips of paper above their heads”. The joining of the village (including her family) to stone Mrs. Hutchinson was done more out of tradition and rituals than out of actual delinquency. The small village of people seem to believe that every year one person is sacrificed for healthy growth of crops. “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon” quoted old man Warner.
Now, the fiction story of the lottery was in no way directed towards any one country, state, person, etc. directly. Soon after the release of “The Lottery” tons of hate mail was sent to The New Yorker (a popular magazine company), and “hundreds of readers canceled their subscriptions“. “Even Jackson’s parents wrote her a letter disapproving of her story”. Of all the upsetting feedback Shirley was receiving from her story, the most drastic measure taken to ensure the entries obliteration was when South Africa banned her story completely (which made Mrs. Jackson proud). Personally, I would have been hurt but, Jackson’s response was “well at least they understand it”. I think she meant when she said “Well at least they understand it” that South Africa has perceived as having many of the cruelest practices known to man.
And although there is no accrediting resource that precedes me to assume whether or not stoning was taking place in 1948, there is evidence that “voters of South Africa are allowing a government policy too continue which drastically limits the freedom of millions of black inhabitants”. A tradition South Africa has yet to cease. But if the very people of South Africa are the same people keeping this belittling tradition around who’s not to say they stopped stoning people? I would not be surprised if I did hear that South Africa stones the “black inhabitants” they confine.
A gruesome fiction story entitled “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson was published in 1948. In this same year South Africa banned it. Jackson’s only reply was "well at least they understand it” she also stated “If your only reason for doing something is that you've always done it, might not be a reason at all”.

I thought I corrected the next error the other evening: they're = their intentions to grow crops.

an depth analysis = an indepth analysis

villagers reactions = villagers' reactions

I believe are = I believe, are, etc.

coward like = coward-like

actions are = actions that are comparable

zombies is a noun so the next 2 words should also be in noun form (not adjective)

You need to rework this entire sentence: "Nancy and Bill Jr. both being Tessie’s older children and the two create the impression that they are truly peppy neither of them have the black dot." (run-on sentence among other things)

opened theirs = the antecedent is not clear = envelope? slips of paper?

fiction story = 2 nouns = fictional story

entries obliteration = entry's obliteration

South Africa has perceived = has been perceived

precedes me to assume ?????not understood at all = allows? persuades?

policy too continue = policy to continue

fiction story = still better as fictional story

run-on sentence = understand it” she also stated “ = either period . She OR ; she

done it, might not be a reason at all”.
= done it, it might not be, etc.

Sra

Sure! Here's the revised version:

Questions arise in the minds of many readers about why Tessie Hutchinson was stoned in Shirley Jackson’s "The Lottery." This dark tale tells the story of an innocent woman facing a violent death in a small village of 300 people. The community believed that this ritual would ensure successful crop growth. Although we may not personally relate to Jackson's story, she made a thought-provoking remark when South Africa banned her work, saying "well at least they understand it." This statement opens up a realm of analysis regarding the reasoning behind this brutal act and whether banning the story justified or made them realize their mistake.

The sacrificial stoning of Tessie Hutchinson on June 27th was carried out without hesitation. Old man Warner and Mr. Summers, the two eldest men in the village, kept the tradition alive. The reactions of countless villagers when reminded of the purpose of the ritual can be seen as cowardly. The other villagers, seemingly unaffected by Tessie's stoning, display zombie-like, demonic, and brainwashed actions.

In a normal circumstance, the execution of a loved one would evoke immense emotion, but the Hutchinson family showed no anguish. Nancy and Bill Jr., Tessie's older children, both appeared cheerful and did not have the black dot. "Nancy and Bill Jr. opened theirs at the same time, and both beamed and laughed, turning around to the crowd and holding their slips of paper above their heads." The participation of the entire village, including Tessie's family, in stoning her seemed more motivated by tradition and ritual rather than her actual wrongdoing. The belief among the villagers was that sacrificing one person each year would ensure a bountiful harvest. "Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon," as quoted by old man Warner.

"The Lottery" is a work of fiction that was not intended to target any particular country, state, or individual directly. However, after its release, The New Yorker received numerous hate mails, and "hundreds of readers canceled their subscriptions." Even Jackson's parents wrote her a disapproving letter. Among all the negative feedback, the most drastic action taken to suppress the story was when South Africa completely banned it, which made Jackson proud. Although I would have been hurt by this response, Jackson's remark, "well at least they understand it," suggests that she viewed South Africa as a country known for cruel practices.

While there is no concrete evidence to support whether stoning took place in 1948, there is documentation that "voters of South Africa are allowing a government policy to continue which drastically limits the freedom of millions of black inhabitants." This suggests that South Africa still holds on to certain oppressive traditions. If the same people who uphold this demeaning tradition are also the ones maintaining the practice of stoning, it wouldn't be surprising to learn that South Africa still carries out such punishments on their "black inhabitants."

Shirley Jackson's gruesome work of fiction, "The Lottery," was published in 1948, the same year it was banned in South Africa. Jackson's response, "well at least they understand it," as well as her statement, "If your only reason for doing something is that you've always done it, might not be a reason at all," provokes deeper reflection on the significance of traditions and the justifications behind them.