How did the British mercantlism prevent the economic development of the colonies?
A.) The colonies were process to export their products to Great Britain only, thus limiting development.
B.) British laws discouraged the growth of manifacture and forced colonies to buy British products
C.) Great Britain bought all of the colonies manufactured products at reduced prices and outlawed their sale between colonies.
B.) British laws discouraged the growth of manufacture and forced colonies to buy British products
The correct answer is B.) British laws discouraged the growth of manufacture and forced colonies to buy British products. British mercantilism prevented the economic development of the colonies by imposing various laws and regulations that hindered their ability to develop their own manufacturing industries. The colonies were restricted from producing certain goods and were instead forced to purchase British products. This limited their economic growth and stifled their ability to become self-sufficient.
To understand how British mercantilism prevented the economic development of the colonies, let's break down the question and analyze the three options given.
A) The colonies were forced to export their products to Great Britain only, thus limiting development.
This option suggests that the colonies were restricted from trading with other countries and could only sell their goods to Great Britain. This limitation would certainly hinder the colonies' economic growth because it restricted their potential market and prevented them from seeking higher prices or better trade deals elsewhere.
B) British laws discouraged the growth of manufacture and forced colonies to buy British products.
This option implies that British laws discouraged the colonies from developing their own manufacturing industries and instead forced them to rely on British products. If the colonies were unable to develop their own industries and had to depend on imported British goods, it would stifle their economic growth and hinder their ability to generate wealth.
C) Great Britain bought all of the colonies' manufactured products at reduced prices and outlawed their sale between colonies.
This option suggests that Great Britain purchased the colonies' manufactured products at lower prices and also prohibited the colonies from trading their products with each other. If Great Britain consistently bought the colonies' goods at reduced prices, it would undermine the colonies' ability to earn fair profits and invest in further development. Additionally, the restriction on inter-colonial trade would limit the economic opportunities within the colonies themselves.
From these options, it becomes clear that all three choices represent various ways in which British mercantilism could have impeded the economic development of the colonies. Each option involves restrictions, limitations, or unfavorable practices that hindered the colonies' economic growth, trade potential, and self-sufficiency.
Therefore, to answer the question, all three options contribute to how British mercantilism prevented the economic development of the colonies. The combined effects of limited export markets, restricted manufacturing capabilities, and unfair trade practices inhibited the colonies' ability to thrive economically.