Film and Physics

I am doing a paper that entails my knowledge of physics to prove errors in the movie Transformers. There is one scene in the movie where Shia (Sam, the hero) falls in Optimus Prime's hand, from around 20 stories high. Obviously Sam should ooze out of Prime's hand, but of course he doesn't. I was wondering if this error can be said to be a true error due to Newton's 1st and 2nd laws of motion. For the 1st law, Sam is stopped by an external force applied to him, otherwise he would keep falling. For the 2nd law, it proves why Prime is unharmed after the fall, and thus why Sam should be harmed and not unharmed like he actually is. Ok, so any information would be great. Thanks a billion!

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 76
  1. You have me pretty puzzled.
    I am not familiar with these characters and their abilities so I am having trouble visualizing what would happen.
    Now the First Law says that your friend Sam will keep right on going at the same speed unless an external force acts on him. That force would have to come from Prime's hand.
    Then the Second Law says that the force acting on Sam is equal to the rate of change of Sam's momentum. If Sam has mass Msam and was moving at speed V in meters per second when he hit Prime's hand and he stops in one meter then
    Average force on Sam Force = Msam (V-0)/time to stop Sam
    Now we can figure out the time to stop Sam. The average speed during the stop is (V-0)/2 or .5 V
    the distance to stop is one meter
    so the time to stop Sam is 1 meter/.5 V
    or t = 2/V
    so the average force on Sam is
    Msam (V^2/2) Newtons if he stops in one meter
    Now you can make a guess at Msam in Kg.
    You can figure out V from the height he fell from at acceleration 9.8 m/s^2
    height = (1/2)9.8 t^2 solve for time in air
    then V = 9.8 t
    The Third Law says the force on Prime will be equal and opposite to the force on Sam.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Damon
  2. And now, you have me puzzled. Thanks anyways, I appreciate it!

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Alexis

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. Movies & Science

    I am doing a paper that entails my knowledge of physics to prove errors in the movie Transformers. There is one scene in the movie where Shia (Sam, the hero) falls in Optimus Prime's hand, from around 20 stories high. Obviously

    asked by Alexis (For bobpursley or Dr. Bob222) on December 31, 2007
  2. Physics and movies

    we are supposed to relate physics to movies, and state mistakes or errors found in the movies based on physics principles. I am trying to do Willy Wonka the 1971 version...I need help trying to prove that Violets becoming a

    asked by Please McHelp me! on December 8, 2007
  3. REPOST

    CAN someone please give me a good idea as how to find information for this problem: we are supposed to relate physics to movies, and state mistakes or errors found in the movies based on physics principles. I am trying to do Willy

    asked by Please McHelp me! on December 8, 2007
  4. LINGUISTICS

    Question Consider the following sentences: (a) River Song is an archaelogist from the future. (b) The number 7 is even Based on these two sentences, which of the following is true? A. (a) entails (b) B. (b) entails (a) C. (a)

    asked by Marcella on March 27, 2011
  5. Urgent Needs Physics Help

    Ok, so I am doing this paper on the physics mistakes in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory. To prove that the everlasting gobstopper defies the laws of physics, I wanted to use Zeno's paradoxes to do so. But are his paradoxes

    asked by Desperate--REPOST on December 16, 2007
  6. URGENT Needs Physics Help

    Ok, so I am doing this paper on the physics mistakes in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory. To prove that the everlasting gobstopper defies the laws of physics, I wanted to use Zeno's paradoxes to do so. But are his paradoxes

    asked by Desperate on December 16, 2007
  7. linguistics

    Question Consider the following sentences: (a) River Song is an archaeologist from the future. (b) River Song has a screwdriver. Based on these two sentences, which of the following is true? A. (a) entails (b) B. (b) entails (a)

    asked by Marcella on March 27, 2011
  8. Science - Proof of Propositional Logics

    I am being asked if I can prove P, L, Q? (without using resolution-refutation). Propositional clauses: 1. P -> V 2. !P -> (!V and F) 3. (V or F) -> Q 4. Q -> L From here I was able, with resolution-refutation, to determine that we

    asked by Jack on February 9, 2008
  9. English

    I have written a persuasive paragraph on the topic of "Knowledge is Power" Please correct the paragraph. "Knowledge is Power" is an idealistic statement and there are three points to prove this. Firstly, when you have knowledge,

    asked by Gopal on January 25, 2008
  10. Math

    I question that 1+1=2. Prove to me that it does. For example I have one car and then buy another car. How many cars do I know have? For English 1+1 does equall two but in math it doesen't. My proof is as follows. I have one sheet

    asked by Joe Smith Bob on April 7, 2008

More Similar Questions