Typical of ballad "lord randall" omits details and ends with half the strory told. do you think the young man's lover poisned him? why or why not. what other questions in regarding the plot are left unanswered?

MY ANSWER: Using dialogue and passion, this ballad succeeded in showing its major themes, love and betrayal. Lord Randall, a passionate lover, was poisoned by his "true-love." the ballad provided different kinds of hints to show this betrayal. In stanza 2, we know that Lord Randall had dinner with his sweetheart in the woods. The readers later realize that the food was poisoned because Lord Randall's dogs ate the leftovers and they died. In the 5th stanza, Lord Randall comes to admit the sad truth, "O yes! I am poisoned..." Lord Randall finally becomes sick in the body and "st the heart" as her betrayal is revealed. As a reader, I keep asking " Why would she do something like that?" .

WHAT DO U THINK I SHOULD ADD ... ESPECIALLY TO THE SECOND PART OF THE QUESTION ...

Thank You ...

How is the word dear used differently by Edward and his mother in “Edward, Edward”? How do you interpret this difference?

The ending is open to interpretation, but if she didn't eat and did poison him, perhaps she had another lover?

Sra

Clown Bot: Ah, the mysteries of the ballad "Lord Randall!" It seems the young man's lover, his so-called "true-love," may indeed have poisoned him. But who knows? Maybe he just had some undercooked fish. Perhaps he had a sudden allergy to tree bark. I mean, stranger things have happened. Either way, it's definitely fishy.

Now, as for the unanswered questions in the plot, oh boy, there are quite a few. First and foremost, what was the motive behind this alleged poisoning? Did Lord Randall forget to take out the trash one too many times? Did he hog the remote control during their Netflix binges? We need answers!

Additionally, how did Lord Randall's dogs manage to eat the leftovers? Were those dogs secretly aspiring gourmet chefs, or did they just have extremely poor taste? And most importantly, did the dogs realize they were eating poisoned food? Did they hesitate before gobbling it all down, or did they just wolf it right down like they didn't give a bone? We'll never truly know.

In conclusion, "Lord Randall" may leave us hanging with these unanswered questions, but let's not lose sleep over it. Embrace the mysterious nature of ballads and enjoy the ride, even if it ends with half the story told.

In regards to the second part of the question about other unanswered plot points in the ballad "Lord Randall," here are a few additional questions you could consider:

1. What was the motive behind the lover's decision to poison Lord Randall? Was it out of jealousy, revenge, or some other reason?

2. What was the lover's true intention in inviting Lord Randall to dine in the woods? Was it simply to spend time together, or did she have ulterior motives from the beginning?

3. What were the events leading up to Lord Randall's suspicions or doubts about his lover's true intentions? Were there any signs or red flags that he may have missed?

4. How did the relationship between Lord Randall and his lover evolve over time? Were they once deeply in love, and if so, what caused their relationship to deteriorate to the point where she would resort to poisoning him?

5. How did Lord Randall's friends, family, and the broader community react to his untimely death? Were they suspicious of his lover's involvement or did they accept his death as a tragic accident?

These unanswered questions can prompt further analysis and interpretation of the ballad, encouraging readers to fill in the gaps and explore the intricacies of the story.