All sages provide both wisdom and inspiration. Since Dasha's speech contained wisdom and greatly inspired her audience, Dasha is a sage. Which one of the following points out the flaw in the argument above?
-Just because Dasha is a sage doesn't mean that she is always wise and inspirational.
-Just because Dasha's speech provided wisdom and inspiration doesn't mean that it provided more wisdom than inspiration.
-Just because Dasha satisfied two requirements of being a sage doesn't necessarily mean that she satisfies all the reqirements of being a sage.
-Just because Dasha provided wisdom and inspiration in a speech doesn't mean that all sages use speeches to provide wisdom and inspiration.
What is your answer?
The flaw in the argument above is pointed out by the option: "Just because Dasha satisfied two requirements of being a sage doesn't necessarily mean that she satisfies all the requirements of being a sage."
The argument assumes that providing both wisdom and inspiration is sufficient to qualify as a sage. However, there may be additional requirements or characteristics that are necessary to be considered a sage. Just because Dasha meets the criteria of providing wisdom and inspiration in her speech, it does not guarantee that she meets all the other criteria to be classified as a sage. Therefore, this option identifies the flaw in the argument.