How can you distinguish between prejudicial and non prejudicial rhetorical devices?
Several answers in here:
http://www.jiskha.com/search/search.cgi?query=prejudicial+and+nonprejudicial
------------------
Also here:
Posted by GuruBlue, on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 at 9:19am
This site will give you the problems with prejudicial rhetoric.
http://epochewiki.pbwiki.com/PburghClarkFinalProposal
The following comes from Answers.com
First, let’s look at what the word rhetoric means.
rhet•o•ric (rtr-k)
n.
1.
a. The art or study of using language effectively and persuasively.
b. A treatise or book discussing this art.
2. Skill in using language effectively and persuasively.
3.
a. A style of speaking or writing, especially the language of a particular subject: fiery political rhetoric.
b. Language that is elaborate, pretentious, insincere, or intellectually vacuous: His offers of compromise were mere rhetoric.
4. Verbal communication; discourse.
Now, let’s say, I am a staunch anti-bubble gum lobbyist. In my rhetoric, I preach against bubble gum arguing (1) it causes bad teeth through excessive sugar, as well as continued pull of the teeth by the gum itself; (2) it is too noisy and disruptive when chewed by teenagers; (3) it is too messy and dangerous when chewed by younger children. They swallow it; they forget to take it out of their mouths at night, and it winds up in their hair and one their clothes or bed sheets.
All bubble gum should be banned! (This is an example of prejudicial rhetoric.)
A non-prejudicial use of rhetoric would be for example arguing the republican position on minimum wage increases versus the democrats position on the same subject. The republican position is that a rise in the minimum wage will be a disadvantage and burden on small business. The democrats state that it has been years since the minimum wage has risen and that low income wage earners need this rise. The truth of the matter is that there are very few jobs in the US that are paying as low as the current minimum wage.
• english - SraJMcGin, Tuesday, February 20, 2007 at 9:46pm
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. First of all, any good dictionary will help you with the meanings.
rhetoric = art of oratory, or speaking well
prejudicial = leading to premature judgment or unwarranted opinion; someone has already formed an opinion
non-prejudicial = no definite opinion stated
srwynjkcg tedrcmj ktafbyzop yscix zvuemgp nzuc euplrvtob
To distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial rhetorical devices, you need to understand their definitions and characteristics. Here's how you can differentiate between the two:
1. Understand Prejudicial Rhetorical Devices:
Prejudicial rhetorical devices are tools used to manipulate or influence an audience's emotions, beliefs, or attitudes based on preconceived notions or biases. They often aim to promote personal opinions or agendas while dismissing opposing viewpoints. Examples of prejudicial rhetorical devices include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and exaggeration of claims.
To identify these devices, consider the following characteristics:
- They rely on fallacies and logical flaws.
- They use emotionally charged language or manipulative tactics.
- They attempt to discredit opponents or their arguments.
- They may rely on stereotypes, prejudices, or biases.
2. Recognize Non-Prejudicial Rhetorical Devices:
Non-prejudicial rhetorical devices, on the other hand, aim to persuade or inform an audience in a fair and objective manner. They focus on logical reasoning, evidence, and objective facts. Examples of non-prejudicial rhetorical devices include statistics, analogies, and expert opinions.
To identify these devices, consider the following characteristics:
- They rely on evidence, research, and logical reasoning.
- They present multiple sides of an argument without bias.
- They aim to educate, inform, or persuade without manipulating emotions.
- They encourage critical thinking and examination of evidence.
When analyzing a speech, article, or any piece of communication, look for the presence of prejudicial or non-prejudicial rhetorical devices. Pay attention to the language, tone, and overall intent of the author or speaker.
Remember that identifying these devices involves careful analysis rather than solely relying on personal opinions or assumptions.