Scalia says that the Constitution is a fundamental exception from (or to)
1. the wishes of judges.
2. the interests of minorities.
3. the rule of law.
4. democracy.
I would say Interests of minorities?
I agree.
This is democracy, my bad.
The correct answer was democracy.
Like the article you put here but this was related to his speech in this interview.
If you're going to ask us questions, please be sure to include all pertinent information! We're good, but we are not mind readers!
No, Scalia does not say that the Constitution is a fundamental exception to the interests of minorities. To determine which choice is correct, let's analyze the options together.
1. The wishes of judges: Scalia does believe that the Constitution serves as a fundamental exception from the wishes of judges. He argues that judges should interpret the Constitution based on its original meaning rather than imposing their personal preferences.
2. The interests of minorities: Scalia does not explicitly state that the Constitution is a fundamental exception to the interests of minorities. However, his strict interpretation of the Constitution leads him to focus on the original intent of the framers, which some argue may have an impact on minority rights. It's important to note that Scalia's views on minority rights and the interpretation of the Constitution have been a subject of debate and controversy.
3. The rule of law: Scalia does not claim that the Constitution is a fundamental exception from the rule of law. In fact, he is known for advocating the originalist perspective, which maintains that the Constitution should be interpreted in a way that adheres to the rule of law.
4. Democracy: Scalia does argue that the Constitution is a fundamental exception from pure democracy. He believes that certain rights and principles laid out in the Constitution should not be subject to the ever-changing will of the majority and should be protected from potential abuse.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 1: the wishes of judges. Scalia contends that the Constitution acts as a fundamental exception from the preferences and personal beliefs of judges.