Tai decided to join a group protest of his university’s policies because he felt it was the right thing to do, even though his participation might result in being arrested. Tai’s behavior is consistent with Kohlberg’s
preconventional morality
conventional morality
unconventional morality
postconventional morality
What do you think?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development
Tai’s behavior is consistent with Kohlberg’s postconventional morality.
To arrive at this answer, it is important to understand Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of moral development. According to Kohlberg, there are three levels of moral development, each with two stages. The three levels are preconventional morality, conventional morality, and postconventional morality.
In the preconventional morality stage, individuals make decisions based on self-interest and obedience to avoid punishment. This stage is typically observed in young children.
Conventional morality is the second stage, where individuals conform to societal expectations and rules. They make decisions based on the approval of others and maintaining social order.
In contrast, postconventional morality is the highest stage of moral development. At this stage, individuals develop their own set of ethical principles and make decisions based on these principles, rather than conforming to external rules and expectations.
In Tai's case, he decided to join a protest because he believed it was the right thing to do, even if it meant being arrested. This demonstrates a higher level of moral reasoning, as Tai is willing to challenge the university policies based on his own principles and convictions, rather than simply conforming to societal expectations or avoiding punishment. Therefore, his behavior aligns with Kohlberg's concept of postconventional morality.