Ok, so I am doing this paper on the physics mistakes in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate factory. To prove that the everlasting gobstopper defies the laws of physics, I wanted to use Zeno's paradoxes to do so. But are his paradoxes correct? There are theories online that say they are wrong. What am I to do?
Zeno's paradoxes are a set of thought experiments that raise philosophical questions about motion and continuity. While they have been debated for centuries, it is important to understand that they are not definitive proof against the laws of physics. In the context of your paper, using Zeno's paradoxes to argue against the physics of the everlasting gobstopper may not be the most suitable approach.
Instead, to prove that the everlasting gobstopper defies the laws of physics, consider focusing on specific principles and concepts in physics that relate to the gobstopper's behavior. For example, you could examine the conservation of energy, Newton's laws of motion, or the laws of thermodynamics. Look for instances where the gobstopper's behavior contradicts these fundamental principles. By focusing on concrete physics concepts, you can build a stronger argument for the movie's departure from real-world physics.
To gather evidence for your argument, you can watch the movie, make notes on the gobstopper's behavior, and identify instances where it defies the laws of physics. Take into account properties like perpetual motion, constant energy output, or any other aspects that seem impossible within the framework of known physical laws.
Additionally, you can research scholarly sources, physics forums, or articles that discuss the scientific inaccuracies in the movie. This will give you further insights and references to support your argument.
Remember, while Zeno's paradoxes are interesting thought experiments, they may not provide the appropriate framework for discussing the physics mistakes in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.