i have a problem with this question my teacher gave me. i don't know what to write for the answer.

the problem: there is a girl named Jane who is hired as the head of the payroll department at R& S Electronic company, firm of 75 employees. she is hired by Eddi the general manager who informs her of the need for maintaining strict confidentiality regarding employee salaries and pay scales. she is also introduced to brad the owner and tells her to see him if there are any problems. 3 moths later Jane began to wonder why Greg a service technician and eddies brother, made so much more commissions than others.she thinks its because he's highly qualified. She also notices brad, Eddie, and Greg having lunch together. one day, Eddie gave Jane the stack of work tickets for service technicians for upcoming week. every technicians had to do this ticket work. since she had a doctors appointment next week she goes to eddies office to tell him about it. When she entered the office she saw Eddie give Greg a separate stack of work tickets. Eddie saw her and told her not to mention it to anyone otherwise she is fired. Jane was upset that Eddie was giving his brother Greg easier, high commission work to his brother and Eddie had authority to fire her. Since she had only been at the company for a short time, she was still on probation. This was her first job since college. she wondered what she should do.

That was the problem and i need to solve it by giving 2 solutions to this problem. i don't know what the solutions should be. i also need 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages for each solution.

Can someone please help me.

Solution 1: Confront Eddie and Brad directly

Advantages:
1. Addressing the issue head-on may lead to a resolution and a fairer work environment.
2. Confronting the issue may result in more transparency and equal opportunities for all employees.
3. This approach may help Jane gain a better understanding of the situation and potential reasons behind the unfair treatment.

Disadvantages:
1. Confronting the superiors could lead to a negative reaction or potential retaliation by Eddie or Brad.
2. Jane might be putting her own job at risk by challenging her employer's actions.
3. There may be a lack of conclusive evidence to support the claims, making it difficult to prove any wrongdoing.

Solution 2: Document evidence and report the issue to higher authorities or Human Resources

Advantages:
1. Collecting evidence of the unfair treatment can provide a stronger case when reporting the issue.
2. Reporting to higher authorities or Human Resources can result in an investigation, leading to potential corrective action.
3. This approach might protect Jane from direct confrontation or the risk of retaliation from Eddie or Brad.

Disadvantages:
1. Jane may face challenges in gathering concrete evidence due to the covert nature of the unfair treatment.
2. An investigation might take time, during which Jane might face continued unfair treatment.
3. The authorities or Human Resources might not take immediate action or might not find enough evidence to support Jane's claims.

Remember, these solutions are only suggestions, and the best course of action should be determined based on the specific circumstances and the potential implications for Jane's personal and professional life. It may be advisable for Jane to seek guidance from a trusted mentor, friend, or professional advisor before deciding on the best approach.

To solve the problem in the scenario, you can consider the following two solutions:

Solution 1: Confront Eddie and Brad
Advantages:
1. Directly addressing the issue with Eddie and Brad allows for open communication.
2. By discussing the concern with the higher-ups, it is possible to gain a better understanding of the situation and potentially seek a resolution.
3. Speaking up against unfair practices can help uphold ethical standards within the company.

Disadvantages:
1. Confronting Eddie and Brad may create tension and strain relationships within the workplace.
2. There is a risk of retaliation by Eddie, potentially resulting in negative consequences for Jane's employment.
3. It may not guarantee a resolution, as Eddie and Brad may deny any wrongdoing or dismiss Jane's concerns.

Solution 2: Gather evidence and report to HR or senior management
Advantages:
1. Collecting evidence of the preferential treatment can provide objective proof to support Jane's claims.
2. Reporting the issue to HR or senior management ensures that the matter is addressed by individuals not directly involved in the situation.
3. This solution may lead to a formal investigation and appropriate actions against Eddie if the evidence supports Jane's allegations.

Disadvantages:
1. Gathering evidence may take time and require discreet actions, potentially placing Jane in a stressful situation.
2. Reporting to HR or senior management may result in a lengthy investigation process, impacting Jane's work environment in the meantime.
3. There is still a possibility that the investigation does not yield a satisfactory outcome, leaving Jane dissatisfied with the resolution.

Remember, when providing solutions, it is important to consider the potential consequences and assess which course of action aligns best with your own values and the company's policies.