review the evaluatio paragraph on p.179 of the text. Identify what the author did well and what the author could hae done better.
Am I supposed to know what is on this page?
article 1 informs readers about the benefits of hand washing, and article 2 persuades readers to wash their hands more. given this information, which method of writing is different between the two articles? comparing authors quick check
To review the evaluation paragraph on page 179 of the text, I would need access to the text itself. However, I can provide you with a general guideline on how to evaluate a paragraph and identify what the author did well and what they could have done better.
1. Read the paragraph: Begin by carefully reading the paragraph in question. Pay attention to the main points, arguments, evidence, and overall structure.
2. Identify strengths: Determine what the author did well in the paragraph. Look for clear and concise writing, logical arguments, use of credible sources or evidence, effective use of examples, and organization of ideas. These factors contribute to a strong evaluation paragraph.
3. Assess weaknesses: Identify any areas where the author could have improved. Look for potential weaknesses such as lack of clarity, unsupported claims or arguments, inconsistency in reasoning, insufficient evidence, or ambiguity. Weaknesses in these areas can lead to an ineffective evaluation paragraph.
4. Evaluate the overall impact: Consider the effectiveness of the paragraph as a whole. Does the author present a compelling argument? Is the evaluation supported by evidence? Does the paragraph provide a balanced perspective? Assess these aspects to determine the overall impact of the paragraph.
Keep in mind that without the specific paragraph from page 179 of the text, I am unable to provide a specific evaluation. Nevertheless, by following these steps, you should be able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of any evaluation paragraph.