It can be said of regulatory commissions that:
A.the commissioners pursue independent and impartial policies, regardless of politcal pressure from democrats or republicans in congress.
B. unlike presidential appointees in other areas, regulatory heads choose which civil servants will work in their agencies, and thus have the full loyalty of career bureaucrats.
C.the broad discretion these commissions have over regulatory policy means that a change in their memembership can have a significant impact.
D.unlike presidential appointees in other areas, the president can hire and fire the heads of regulatory commissions whenever he or she chooses.
I vote for c.
Ms. Sue, one of your last answers on this question was A. Do you qactually know what you are doing here?
It seems that you are just guessing or always concurring with the person that asks the question.
To determine the correct option, let's break down the statements and analyze them one by one:
A. the commissioners pursue independent and impartial policies, regardless of political pressure from Democrats or Republicans in Congress.
To verify this statement, we would need to understand the nature of regulatory commissions and how they operate. Regulatory commissions are meant to be independent bodies that make decisions based on their expertise and the law, rather than political pressure. While their independence is generally desirable, it may not always be the case in reality. To confirm if commissioners indeed pursue independent and impartial policies, one can research the specific commission in question, review its mission and values, and look for any instances where political pressure has influenced their decision-making process.
B. unlike presidential appointees in other areas, regulatory heads choose which civil servants will work in their agencies, and thus have the full loyalty of career bureaucrats.
To verify this statement, one would need to understand the appointment process for regulatory heads and how they interact with civil servants. Researching the relevant laws or regulations governing these appointments, as well as examining the relationship between regulatory heads and civil servants within the specific agency, can provide insights into whether regulatory heads have the authority to choose and influence the loyalty of civil servants within their agencies.
C. the broad discretion these commissions have over regulatory policy means that a change in their membership can have a significant impact.
To evaluate this statement, one must assess the extent of discretion regulatory commissions have over regulatory policies and understand how changes in membership can affect decision-making. Reviewing the powers and responsibilities granted to these commissions by law, examining past instances where membership changes have led to shifts in policy, and studying any case studies or academic research on the topic could provide insights into whether a change in membership truly has a significant impact.
D. unlike presidential appointees in other areas, the president can hire and fire the heads of regulatory commissions whenever he or she chooses.
To determine the accuracy of this statement, one would need to understand the appointment and removal process for heads of regulatory commissions. Researching the laws or regulations governing these appointments, reviewing historical instances of appointments and removals, and examining any legal limitations or requirements on the president's authority can help verify whether the president can hire and fire heads of regulatory commissions at will.
Based on the explanations above, it appears that option C is the most likely correct answer. The broad discretion that regulatory commissions have over regulatory policy suggests that a change in their membership can indeed have a significant impact. However, it is advisable to conduct further research to confirm this and gain a deeper understanding of the specific regulatory commissions being referenced.