History-Civil War

How important was the Union blockade to defeating the Confederacy, and how could the Union have won without it ?

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 99
asked by Joanne
  1. Try some of the following links for information:

    1. http://www.google.com/search?q=How+important+was+the+Union+blockade+to+defeating+the+Confederacy&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

    2. http://www.google.com/search?q=how+could+the+Union+have+won+without+the+blockade&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

    Sra

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  2. I would think this is the important section of the Naval Institute report:
    -------------------
    from

    http://www.usni.org/magazines/navalhistory/2011-03/navys-evolutionary-war

    --------------------
    Assessing the Blockade’s Effectiveness

    Southern supply bases greatly simplified the U.S. Navy’s job, but maintaining the blockade remained a challenging and often thankless task. The general pattern of trade was for conventional cargo vessels from Europe to bring their goods to a neutral port such as St. George in Bermuda, Nassau in the Bahamas, or Havana, Cuba. There the cargoes were off-loaded into low, fast blockade runners. The vessels, almost always unarmed, then attempted to run into a blockaded port, usually at night. Blacked out and painted a dark gray, they sought to dash past Union warships without being sighted, or if they were spotted, to outrun their pursuers. Those that made it into port would later attempt to dash out to sea, usually loaded with cotton or other exports.

    Given the difficulty of spotting or catching them, it is not surprising that most of the ships that tried to run the blockade did so successfully. A more important factor, however, was that relatively few ships tried it. In the last full year of peace, some 20,000 ships entered or left Southern ports, but during the war, that number dropped to only 2,000 ships per year. Even more telling, cotton exports from the South dropped from just under 3 million bales a year before the war to just over 50,000 in the first year of the conflict—less than 2 percent of the prewar total.5

    A precise calculation of just how much the Union blockade hurt the Confederacy is elusive. On the one hand, the South was able to import the essential matériel it needed to sustain its economy and war effort—including 400,000 rifles, 3 million pounds of lead, and more than 2.2 million pounds of saltpeter for manufacturing gunpowder. Historian Stephen Wise is undoubtedly correct in concluding that “without blockade running the nation’s military would have been without proper supplies of arms, bullets, and powder.”6

    On the other hand, the blockade had a cumulative eroding effect on the Southern economy and contributed to inflation and war weariness within both the civilian population and the Army, thereby undermining the Confederate war effort. As historian William H. Roberts put it, if the blockade was “never airtight” it “was constricting enough that the South was constantly gasping for economic breath.” It is likely that the Union would have won the war even without the blockade, as long as the Northern population sustained the Lincoln administration, but almost as surely the war would have lasted longer and been more costly. So it is possible to argue that the blockade probably saved many thousands of lives.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Damon
  3. Thank You Damon !

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    posted by Joanne

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. us history

    How did the presence of the border states illustrate a difference between the Union and Confederacy? The Confederacy had more internal political disagreements than the Union. The Confederacy had more states on its side than the

    asked by Oscar on March 26, 2015
  2. us history

    How did the presence of the border states illustrate a difference between the Union and Confederacy? The Confederacy had more internal political disagreements than the Union. The Confederacy had more states on its side than the

    asked by Oscar on March 27, 2015
  3. Social studies

    Why would ironclads prove more important to the union then to the Confederacy? A. The war at sea was not in Porten to the confederacy but it was to the union. B. The Confederates you did not have the resources to make ironclads

    asked by Cxgjbcf on February 15, 2017
  4. Social Studies

    The Battle for Fort Sumter did which of the following? Gave the Union control over the Mississippi River Demonstrated the superiority of the Union's military leaders Gave the Confederacy possession of an important military base

    asked by J.J. on July 30, 2015
  5. history

    13. The Battle of Fort Sumter did which of the following? (5 points) gave the Union control over the Mississippi River demonstrated the superiority of the Union's military leaders gave the Confederacy possession of an important

    asked by Amanda Fire on May 28, 2015
  6. history

    5. Public Domain How is the U.S Constitution portrayed in this cartoon? A. always winning, despite attempts, to misinterpret it. B. losing to anyone willing to study and use it. C. too complex for any one person to interpret D.

    asked by summer moriarty on April 29, 2016
  7. social studies 7th

    Confused! Who were the presidents of the United States and of the Confederate States of America? My child has as an answer- The Union and the Confederacy each had a president. The president of the Union was Abraham Lincoln, while

    asked by Mom needs help! on September 17, 2011
  8. us history

    What advantages does the Union have over the Confederacy? The Confederacy over the Union?

    asked by Wyeth on December 12, 2010
  9. History

    General T. Sherman explains that his aim was to relentlessly pursue the confederacy and and make them fear and dread him and the union army. Which wartime strategy is represented by this idea? naval blockade martial law total war

    asked by Juliana on January 13, 2017
  10. ihstory

    During the election of 1936, declaring their party a "millionaire's union," Franklin Roosevelt focused mainly on defeating the A. Union Party running William Lemke. B. Liberty League running Father Coughlin. C. Union Party running

    asked by sergey on March 25, 2013

More Similar Questions