1865: Marching through Georgia

In terms of supply, how was Sherman"s march different than other Civil War campaigns?
What I found was..Sherman telegraphed President
Lincoln, asking him as a gift to Savannah, he would need 150 guns along with plenty of ammunition...also
found that he took from their lands???????

http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/civilwar/p/marchtosea.htm

You didn't look very hard. Sherman was a War Criminal, as was Grant who approved his campaign.

I already was on that site you gave me...no..I'm looking tooo hard, it could be right under my nose and I don't even know it. I look up for HRS. I have a hard time absorbing this subject..I always did. Thank You for your time anyway.

Sherman's March to the Sea, which took place in 1864-1865, was indeed different from other Civil War campaigns in terms of supply. Sherman's strategy involved conducting a military campaign that targeted the Confederate army's infrastructure and supply lines, aiming to disrupt their ability to continue the war effort.

Regarding your question about Sherman requesting supplies from President Lincoln, this request did happen. Sherman telegraphed President Lincoln on December 22, 1864, and asked for the gift of Savannah as a Christmas present. He stated that he would require 150 heavy guns and large quantities of ammunition to secure the city.

As for the claim that Sherman took from the lands he marched through, this is partially true. Sherman ordered his troops to live off the land during their march, which meant that they would forage and take supplies such as food and livestock from the areas they passed through. This strategy aimed to reduce the burden on their supply lines and ensure the success of the campaign.

To answer your original question about how Sherman's march was different in terms of supply compared to other Civil War campaigns, here are a few key points:

1. Limited reliance on traditional supply lines: Instead of relying solely on a long and vulnerable supply chain, Sherman's army lived off the land and confiscated supplies from the Confederate forces they encountered. This approach reduced their reliance on lengthy supply lines, which made them faster and less predictable.

2. Strategic targeting of infrastructure: Sherman's primary objective was to cripple the Confederate army and its ability to sustain the war effort. To achieve this, he targeted critical infrastructure, including railways, factories, and supply depots. By destroying these targets, he disrupted the Confederate supply lines and hindered their ability to resupply their troops.

3. Efficient use of available resources: By relying on the resources found in the areas they marched through, Sherman's army maximized their efficiency and minimized their logistical burden. This allowed them to sustain their campaign across a significant distance and maintain the element of surprise.

In summary, Sherman's March to the Sea was different from other Civil War campaigns in terms of supply because it relied mostly on living off the land, targeting infrastructure, and making efficient use of available resources.