Is it good or bad for corporations to rely on vendors for computing support? List arguments both for and against reliance on vendors as part of your answer.

This question is asking for your opinion, not ours.

You might get some ideas from this article.

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:faI9i6_gAl0J:h20247.www2.hp.com/enterprise/downloads/WP_Cyon_Research_Importance_of_Partnerships_2005.pdf+corporations+to+rely+on+vendors+for+computing+support&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi9F-pp_GJnb9B5bOjuBqkzQ7dK7JhnytxyNYxsBchAoG2lDloaOKebEG9cFeRw79C6ZPRXkwcbcJy88vBpJBvhawSrkGhokSwvu9zbvGXjGyoaZree_srjUmsSPg6efEfC9L0F&sig=AHIEtbSlsm-meHG767S_PqyE0kC-Frhr2w

yes it is, specially when the midget on the meteor is the one who will actually come on earth and stop all the greed that is goin on in American corporations, therefore if the baseball league or the football league stop calling this crap world series where only american teams are playing!, it will be really nice thanks...hope that will help :)

To determine whether it is good or bad for corporations to rely on vendors for computing support, let's examine arguments both for and against this practice:

Arguments for reliance on vendors:

1. Expertise and specialized knowledge: Vendors often have expertise and specialized knowledge in specific areas of computing support. By relying on vendors, corporations can benefit from their experience and industry insights, allowing for efficient and effective technology deployments.

2. Cost efficiency: Outsourcing computing support to vendors can be cost-effective for corporations, especially for smaller or mid-sized companies. It eliminates the need to hire and train in-house IT staff, reduces overhead costs, and allows for predictable budgeting through fixed vendor contracts.

3. Scalable solutions: Vendors typically offer scalable solutions that can adapt to the changing needs of a corporation. As the business grows or undergoes technological transformations, vendors can provide the necessary support to ensure a seamless transition or expansion.

Arguments against reliance on vendors:

1. Lack of control: Depending heavily on vendors may limit a corporation's control over their computing systems. They may need to rely on the vendors' policies, service level agreements, and response times, which might not align with the corporation's specific needs or priorities.

2. Data security and privacy concerns: Outsourcing computing support could involve sharing sensitive data and access privileges with vendors. This raises concerns about data security, privacy, and the risk of third-party breaches or unauthorized access.

3. Dependency on third-party support: By relying too heavily on vendors, corporations can become overly dependent on external providers. This dependency can create challenges if there are issues with the vendor's availability, service interruptions, or changes in vendor relationships.

To form a conclusion, corporations should consider their unique circumstances, such as budget, size, industry, and strategic priorities. They should assess the benefits and drawbacks of vendor reliance in relation to their specific needs and evaluate the vendor's reliability, security measures, and compatibility with their long-term goals. Conducting a thorough cost-benefit analysis can help make an informed decision on whether to rely on vendors for computing support.