The great Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun saw history as a struggle between
http://historymedren.about.com/od/kwho/p/who_khaldun.htm
different civilizations and cultural groups. According to Ibn Khaldun, history was shaped by a continuous struggle between "sedentary" societies and "nomadic" societies.
To understand this concept, we will first need to delve into Ibn Khaldun's theory of civilization and its development.
Ibn Khaldun proposed that societies evolve and go through distinct stages. He identified two primary types of societies - sedentary and nomadic. Sedentary societies refer to settled agricultural communities that build cities, develop complex social structures, and engage in various forms of sophisticated economic activities. Nomadic societies, on the other hand, are characterized by a lack of permanent settlements, and rely primarily on herding and constant movement.
According to Ibn Khaldun, civilizations would experience a rise and fall in a cyclical pattern. Nomadic tribes would often invade sedentary societies, overthrow their rulers, and establish their own empires. However, as these nomadic groups established their reign, they would gradually adopt the sedentary lifestyle, leading to the decline of their own empire. Subsequently, a new nomadic group would emerge, conquer the declining sedentary civilization, and the cycle would repeat itself.
Ibn Khaldun's view was that this struggle between sedentary and nomadic societies formed the basis of historical change. He believed that the constant interaction and conflict between civilizations and cultural groups were fundamental to the progress and decline of societies.
To further explore Ibn Khaldun's ideas, you can study his most famous work, "Muqaddimah" (translated as "Introduction" or "Prolegomena"). In this book, he elaborates on his theory of civilization and offers an in-depth analysis of historical development.
It is important to note that Ibn Khaldun's perspective reflects a certain historical and cultural context, and his ideas were formulated based on his observations of the societies of his time. While his theories may not be universally applicable to all historical contexts, they provide valuable insights into the dynamics of civilizations and the interplay between different cultural groups.