I am doing an argumentative essay on chemtrails and I need some help on the opposing side (what's their agrument).

I have 2 points so far and I need three the 2 so far are:

1. Some say that the lines are contrails
2. Some say it's condensation from the jet engines when flying at high alititude/low temps.

The smoke from rockets shot from the ground up into the sky.

??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory

http://www.nmsr.org/chemtrls.htm

Thanks for all the help!!

You're welcome.

To find another argument opposing the notion of chemtrails, you can consider the following:

3. Lack of scientific evidence: Skeptics argue that there is a lack of credible scientific evidence supporting the existence of chemtrails. They claim that most of the so-called evidence consists of anecdotal accounts, conspiracy theories, and unreliable sources. They suggest that the trails observed in the sky are simply normal contrails and that the idea of intentional spraying is unsubstantiated.

To further develop this argument, you can explore the following points:

a. Atmospheric conditions: Critics contend that the atmospheric conditions required for the formation of contrails, such as temperature, humidity, and altitude, are well-documented scientific phenomena. They argue that these conditions can adequately explain the persistence and spread of the trails observed in the sky.

b. Aviation industry perspective: The aviation industry, including scientists, engineers, and pilots, generally dismisses the concept of chemtrails. They argue that the occurrence of contrails is a predictable consequence of engine exhaust interacting with the atmosphere, and there is no evidence to suggest deliberate spraying of any substances.

c. Regulatory oversight: Opponents of the chemtrails theory emphasize that if there were indeed large-scale spraying operations happening, it would require significant resources and coordination. They argue that such activities would be subject to strict regulatory oversight and would be hard to conceal from the public and media.

Remember, while considering opposing arguments, it is essential to maintain an objective perspective and accurately represent differing viewpoints, regardless of your own beliefs.