In paragraph 2 of Swimming Strokes by Lee Carroll, I found 1 error in subject-verb agreement, 0 errors in parallelism, and 1 error in pronoun-antecedent agreement. I was wondering were they correct because all the errors in the passage range from 0 errors to 3 errors and nothing higher than 3 errors?

You need to type that paragraph here.

Sra

To determine the accuracy of your findings regarding subject-verb agreement, parallelism, and pronoun-antecedent agreement in paragraph 2 of "Swimming Strokes" by Lee Carroll, it is necessary to review the paragraph itself. However, as an AI text-based model, I do not have access to specific texts or the ability to directly analyze them. I can, however, provide guidance on how you can approach determining the validity of your conclusions:

1. Review the paragraph: Read through paragraph 2 of "Swimming Strokes" by Lee Carroll again and identify instances where subject-verb agreement, parallelism, and pronoun-antecedent agreement are used.

2. Subject-verb agreement: Pay attention to whether the subject and verb in each sentence agree in terms of number (i.e., singular or plural). If you believe you have found an error, ensure that the subject and verb do not match correctly.

3. Parallelism: Check for parallel structure in a list or series of items within sentences. Verify if there are any inconsistencies in the structure of the items listed. If your conclusion states 0 errors in parallelism, it means you didn't find any deviations from parallel structure.

4. Pronoun-antecedent agreement: Look for sentences with pronouns (such as he, she, it, they) and identify the corresponding antecedent (the noun or noun phrase the pronoun refers to). Confirm that the pronouns correctly match their antecedents in terms of number and gender.

After going through these steps, you will be better equipped to evaluate the accuracy of your findings. Remember to trust your judgment but also consider seeking a second opinion or consulting available resources to validate your conclusions.