Socials

Confederation: For and against..

In a chart, list Joseph Hows's points against Confederation in one column, and Macdonald's points in favour of Confederation in another.

This is what Joseph Howe said:

Let us see what the Canadians desiere to do. They are not, as have shown, a very harmonious or homogeneous community. Two-fifths of the population are french and three fifths are english. They are therefore perplexed with an internal antagonism which... must ever be a source of weakness. They are shut in by frost from the outer world for five months of the year. They are at the mercy of a powerful neighbour whose population already outnumbers them by more than eight to one...on the opposite side of a natural defenceless frontier. Surely such conditions as these ought to repress inordinate ambition or lust of territory on part of the public men of Canada. It is evident that a more uncompromising nucleaus of a new nation can hardly be found on the face of the Earth, and that any organized communites, having a reasonable chance to do anything better, would be politically insane to give up their distinct formations and subject themselves to the domination of Canada.
When franchises were conferred upon the people of the Maritime provinces, and legislatures given to them, they could only be yielded up by voluntary consent or be forfeited by misconduct. When self-government was conceded, it could never afterwards be withdrawn.

These are the points I got for him, it was kind of hard to understand what exactly he was saying, but I kind of made out some words, so heres what I got:

* Strong, independent, and mature on their own
*French and english can never become one nation, as they are separate and can not get along
*No point in joining, nothing says we have to join, no law
*If Confederation takes place, we will not be able to maintain ties with Britain

I'll post Macdonalds point of view after I go and eat. brb:)

  1. 👍 0
  2. 👎 0
  3. 👁 178
  1. Here are more arguments.

    perplexed with an internal antagonism which... must ever be a source of weakness.

    They are shut in by frost from the outer world for five months of the year.

    They are at the mercy of a powerful neighbour whose population already outnumbers them by more than eight to one...on the opposite side of a natural defenceless frontier.

    When self-government was conceded, it could never afterwards be withdrawn.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    👩‍🏫
    Ms. Sue
  2. Those are the ones I don't really understand, what does he mean by those statements?

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  3. The Canadians split between French- and English-speaking people, who don't like each other.

    It's so cold, that Canadians don't have much contact with the outer world during the winter.

    The U.S. greatly outnumbers Canadians. The border between the two countries cannot be defended.

    Once you vote for Confederation, it's done! You can't reverse this decision.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    👩‍🏫
    Ms. Sue
  4. Alright, thanks so much for the translation:)

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
  5. You're welcome.

    1. 👍 0
    2. 👎 0
    👩‍🏫
    Ms. Sue

Respond to this Question

First Name

Your Response

Similar Questions

  1. History, please check

    1. Which was a weakness of the Articles of Confederation? (1 point) Congress did not have the power to create a military. Congress did not have the power to tax the states.*** States had no way to settle disputes between other

  2. civics

    which of the following is an achievement of the U.S government under the articles of confederation?

  3. History

    Why did the Articles of Confederation have to be replaced by the Constitution? A) The Articles of Confederation were never ratified by the states. B) The Articles angered state leaders by giving the central government too much

  4. History

    Which two weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation were exposed by Shays’s Rebellion The national government was subject to all of the states collectively and could not collect funds owed, leading to unfinanced veteran back

  1. History

    What was the significance of the Boston Massacre? A. It marked the start of the American Revolution. B. It increased tensions between American colonists and England. C. It brought a temporary end to colonial protests. D. It led

  2. social studies

    Why did the Articles of Confederation have to be replaced by the Constitution? A. The Articles angered state leaders by giving the central government too much power. B. The Articles of Confederation were never ratified by the

  3. social studies

    Select two events that highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation that prompted leaders from several states to call for a convention to revise the Articles of Confederation (select two) a.Due to arguments over

  4. 10th grade

    What is the role of the state governments under the articles of confederation?

  1. History

    Which of the following statements most accurately analyzes how the Philadelphia Convention shaped the new national government? It prevented Federalists from establishing a central government headed by a royal monarch, which was

  2. history

    what was the power given by the articles of confederation?

  3. History

    Which of the following was an anachievement of the US government under the Articles of Confederation

  4. American History

    What statement most accurately describes the impact the Articles of Confederation had on the correlation of power between the federal and state government? The Articles of Confederation attempted to balance the power between the

You can view more similar questions or ask a new question.