TVC is opposed to any research that involves the deliberate killing of one human to benefit another human. "An unborn human is not of less value than a Parkinson's victim who needs treatment

The first sentence seems to be a statement. Since the second sentence contains an opinion that can be argued, that sentence is a thesis on which an argument can be based, but it is not an argument itself.

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/argument.htm

http://www.powa.org/content/blogcategory/21/111/

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/01/

To address this statement, it’s important to touch on the ethical controversy surrounding the deliberate killing of one human for the benefit of another. While I will do my best to provide an objective analysis, please note that this is a sensitive topic, and individual beliefs and perspectives may differ.

The statement suggests that the organization TVC is against any research that involves intentionally causing the death of one human to benefit another. Additionally, it asserts that an unborn human should be considered of equal value to a person suffering from Parkinson's disease who requires treatment.

The underlying ethical principles guiding these viewpoints may revolve around the value placed on human life, the sanctity of life, and the question of when human life begins. Different people and organizations may hold varying perspectives on these matters, depending on their moral, religious, or philosophical beliefs.

Regarding the comparison between an unborn human and a Parkinson's victim requiring treatment, it is essential to acknowledge that ethical arguments exist on both sides. Some may argue for the importance of fetal rights and consider an unborn human to be of equal value to a living person. Others may prioritize the well-being and quality of life of individuals who have already been born.

To answer the question and consider both viewpoints, it would be helpful to gather further information about specific arguments from TVC or any relevant research to better understand their stance. Exploring the organization's philosophical or ethical framework, as well as seeking opinions from experts in bioethics and related fields, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.