What does the following question mean?
--
How can you live within a democracy that expects you to participate, to hold an opinion and vote and thereby control and be responsible for your society—but at the same time, you must surrender and follow the will of others if even the slimmest majority disagrees with you?
--
Does it mean that society is repressive even though it's a democracy?
Please I need to know ASAP
We give up certain liberties in order to enjoy the protections of the government. You should read John Locke's work, especially his treatises on government:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke
=)
Democracy can be repressive, if the majority desires it. The better idea is a democracy with fundamental guarantees for all: certain freedoms are not to be violated, such as freedom of religion, freedom of privacy, freedom to vote, freedom to speak freely, freedom to ....
Democracy in itself is no guarantee of freedom from opression. Tyranny can be from one, or from the majority. There has to be independent checks.
Now outside the fundamental guarantees, if there are some, there can still be repression. Want to burn a flag? Want to protest at school? Want to go naked in your yard? Some see these as repression. Maybe, maybe not.
A good question, one that has troubled political thinkers for some time. Have fun with it.
The question you provided seems to be expressing a concern or contradiction within a democratic society. It highlights the tension between the expectation of active participation, having opinions, voting, and being responsible for shaping the society on one hand, and the need to follow the will of the majority, even if it goes against your own beliefs, on the other hand. The question could be interpreted as asking how one can live in a democracy that both encourages participation and decision-making, but also requires individuals to accept the decisions made by the majority, even if they personally disagree.
Regarding your interpretation about society being repressive despite being a democracy, it could be one way to interpret the question. It suggests that even in a democratic system, there may be limitations or concerns about the extent of individual freedom and control when faced with decisions made by others. However, it's essential to note that interpretations of the question may vary depending on the perspective and context of the person asking it.
If you need further clarification or more in-depth analysis, feel free to provide more details or context about the question, and I'll be glad to assist you.