I got 95% on the appendix B matrix about consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. But do not understand this assignment.
Describe, in 200 to 300 words, how you might conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 of Appendix B using each of the stakeholder impact analysis approaches: moral standards, five-question, and Pastin’s approach.
This is the scenario-
The mayor of a small seaside town faces a tough decision. A prominent developer has submitted a proposal to build a large mall and resort in the town. This development is estimated to bring $150 million in tourism each year and several hundred new jobs to the community, which badly needs the economic boost. The proposed location of the new development, however, is a site that now houses the only nursing home and senior citizens’ recreation center in the area. Both the nursing home and recreation center would have to be demolished, affecting 100 seniors and 30 employees. There is no other location in town where the new development can be built. How should the mayor decide: in favor of economic prosperity or in defense of his elderly citizens?
Student responses must correctly describe how to conduct a stakeholder impact analysis using each of the three approaches described in Ch. 5: moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach. Responses should address the following key points in the context of the scenario:
Descriptions of the three standards that comprise the moral standards approach: utilitarian, individual rights, and justice
Identification of the questions used in the 5-question approach:
1. Is the decision profitable? 2. Is the decision legal? 3.Is the decision fair? 4. Is the decision right? 5. Does the decision further sustainable development?
Descriptions of the four key aspects of Pastin’s approach:
1. Ground rule ethics 2. End-point ethics 3. Rule ethics 4. Social contract ethics
Please, please, please help me
Sure! I can help you understand how to conduct a stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1 using the moral standards, five-question, and Pastin's approach.
To conduct a stakeholder impact analysis using the moral standards approach, you need to consider three ethical standards: utilitarian, individual rights, and justice.
For the utilitarian standard, consider the overall happiness or well-being that the proposed development would bring to the community as a whole. Calculate the net gains in terms of economic prosperity, new jobs, and tourism revenue against the losses suffered by the nursing home residents and employees.
For the individual rights standard, focus on the rights and interests of the 100 seniors and 30 employees who would be adversely affected. Evaluate whether their rights to healthcare, recreation, and employment would be violated or compromised by the demolition of the nursing home and recreation center.
For the justice standard, analyze whether the proposed development would distribute benefits and burdens in a fair and equitable manner. Assess whether the potential economic benefits justify the harm caused to the elderly citizens and their loss of access to essential services.
Moving on to the five-question approach, you need to answer the following questions in relation to the scenario:
1. Is the decision profitable? Assess the financial gains from the development, the potential boost to the local economy, and the long-term sustainability of the project.
2. Is the decision legal? Investigate whether the proposed development complies with existing laws and regulations.
3. Is the decision fair? Analyze the fairness of the outcome, considering the impact on different stakeholders such as the elderly citizens, employees, and the community as a whole.
4. Is the decision right? Evaluate the moral implications of the decision, weighing the benefits against the harm caused to the nursing home residents and employees.
5. Does the decision further sustainable development? Examine whether the proposed development aligns with principles of sustainability and environmental responsibility.
Lastly, using Pastin's approach, consider four key aspects: ground rule ethics, end-point ethics, rule ethics, and social contract ethics.
1. Ground rule ethics involves considering the values and principles that guide decision-making in society and how they apply to the scenario.
2. End-point ethics focuses on the potential long-term consequences of the decision and whether it would lead to a desirable outcome for all stakeholders.
3. Rule ethics pertains to the adherence to ethical rules and standards in making the decision.
4. Social contract ethics considers the expectations, obligations, and agreements between different stakeholders and how they factor into the decision-making process.
By considering these three approaches and their respective components, you can conduct a comprehensive stakeholder impact analysis of Scenario 1. Remember to weigh the pros and cons, consider the different ethical perspectives, and evaluate the balance between economic prosperity and the well-being of the elderly citizens.