Which of the following statements is generally not true about state intermediate appellate courts?

A. Appellate court decisions are final and further appeal is not possible.
B. The appellate court reviews the record of the trial court.
C. The appellate court allows the parties to introduce new evidence so long as it was not previously introduced at the original trial.
D. The appellate court usually allows the parties to file briefs outlining support for their positions.
E. The appellate court allows the parties to make oral arguments outlining their position.

. Appellate court decisions are final and further appeal is not possible.

. The appellate court reviews the record of the trial court

The statement that is generally not true about state intermediate appellate courts is C. The appellate court allows the parties to introduce new evidence so long as it was not previously introduced at the original trial.

To determine which statement is generally not true about state intermediate appellate courts, let's analyze each option:

A. Appellate court decisions are final and further appeal is not possible.
This statement is generally not true. State intermediate appellate courts provide an opportunity for parties to appeal decisions made by lower trial courts. However, it's important to note that there are instances when appellate court decisions are considered final, and further appeal can only be pursued in higher courts like state supreme courts or federal courts.

B. The appellate court reviews the record of the trial court.
This statement is generally true. One of the primary functions of state intermediate appellate courts is to review the record of the trial court. They carefully examine the evidence, witness testimonies, and legal arguments presented during the initial trial.

C. The appellate court allows the parties to introduce new evidence so long as it was not previously introduced at the original trial.
This statement is generally not true. State intermediate appellate courts typically focus on reviewing the record of the trial court and do not allow new evidence to be introduced. Their role is to assess whether legal errors occurred during the trial or if the lower court's decision was based on the correct interpretation of the law.

D. The appellate court usually allows the parties to file briefs outlining support for their positions.
This statement is generally true. Both parties involved in the case are usually allowed to file briefs in state intermediate appellate courts. These briefs outline the legal arguments, precedents, and relevant facts to support their positions. The briefs provide an opportunity for the parties to present their case in a written format.

E. The appellate court allows the parties to make oral arguments outlining their position.
This statement is generally true. State intermediate appellate courts often allow each party to present oral arguments during the appeal. Oral arguments provide an opportunity for the parties to present their case verbally before a panel of appellate judges. This allows the judges to ask questions, seek clarifications, and evaluate the arguments put forth by each party.

In conclusion, the statement that is generally not true about state intermediate appellate courts is C. The appellate court usually does not allow the parties to introduce new evidence, as its primary role is to review the record of the trial court.