Andy, age 16 lacks self-discipline fails to plan ahead and is quickly frustrated by challenging tasks. He is anxious and overly critical of others. Use the psychoanalytic, humanistic, and social-cognitive perspectives to give three contrasting explanations of Andy's behaviour.
Andy suffers from regession
I do not Know
he has a weak ego
Psychoanalytic Perspective:
From a psychoanalytic perspective, Andy's behavior can be explained through unconscious conflicts rooted in his early childhood experiences. According to Sigmund Freud, Andy may be exhibiting a lack of self-discipline and frustration due to unresolved conflicts within his unconscious mind. These conflicts could be related to his upbringing, such as inconsistent parenting or traumatic experiences during his early development. Psychoanalytic theory suggests that these unresolved conflicts and repressed emotions continue to influence his behavior during adolescence. Therefore, Andy's lack of self-discipline, failure to plan, and frustration can be seen as manifestations of unconscious conflicts and past experiences that have not been resolved.
Humanistic Perspective:
From a humanistic perspective, Andy's behavior can be attributed to his self-perception and the discrepancy between his actual self and ideal self. According to humanistic psychologists such as Carl Rogers, individuals strive to achieve their ideal self, which represents their vision of who they want to be. If Andy perceives a significant gap between his actual and ideal self, he might experience feelings of anxiety and self-criticism. Consequently, Andy's lack of self-discipline and frustration can be seen as a result of his anxiety about not meeting his own standards. He may also be overly critical of others as a defense mechanism to protect his self-esteem by attributing his shortcomings to external factors.
Social-Cognitive Perspective:
From a social-cognitive perspective, Andy's behavior can be explained by examining the role of his environment and cognitive processes. Social-cognitive theory, proposed by Albert Bandura, emphasizes the reciprocal relationship between individuals and their environment. Andy's lack of self-discipline, failure to plan ahead, and frustration can be understood as learned behaviors influenced by his social context. For example, if Andy has grown up in an environment where planning and self-discipline were not encouraged or modeled, he may not have learned these skills effectively. Furthermore, his anxiety and critical attitude towards others could be shaped by his observations of others who are anxious or critical. From a social-cognitive perspective, Andy's behavior reflects his socialization and the cognitive processes that have been acquired through observation, modeling, and reinforcement.
It is important to note that these perspectives provide contrasting explanations and are theoretical frameworks used to understand human behavior. It is essential to consider a holistic approach and not limit the understanding of Andy's behavior to a single perspective.