examine each source below and write in paragraph form, a response in which you:
-interpret each source to identify and explain the perspective(s) related to Nationalism.
-identify and discuss one or more ideological concepts that are refleted in the sources.
-Use your knowlage and understandings of social studies and the information in the sources to support your idea.
SOURCE 1
"the lines of red are blood, nobly and unselfish shed by men who loved the liberty of their fellowmen more than they loved their own lives and fourtunes. God forbid that we would ever use the blood of America to freshen the colour of the flag. But if it should ever be necessary, that flag will be coloured once more, and in being coloured will be glorified and purified." - Woodrow Wilson, flag day speech.
SOURCE 2
"No matter how this aim sounds, this new century must become the century of humanity, when we as human beings rise above race, creed, colour, religion, and national self-interest and put the good of humanity above the good of our own tribe." - Lietenant-General Romeo Dallaire
How would you like us to help you with this assignment?
Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/
Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.
jew bags
thats the thing i do not know what these sources mean and how they relate to nationalism. if smeone explains them to me then i can do the rest myself.
Source 1, a quote from Woodrow Wilson's Flag Day speech, reflects a perspective on nationalism that emphasizes sacrifice and loyalty to one's country. Wilson speaks of the red lines on the American flag as representing the blood shed by individuals who prioritized the liberty of their fellow citizens over their own lives and fortunes. He suggests that the flag should never be stained with American blood but acknowledges that if necessary, it would be colored once more and that act would elevate and purify the flag.
This perspective aligns with the concept of civic nationalism, which emphasizes the values and principles of a nation-state and the collective well-being of its citizens. In this case, Wilson's emphasis on sacrificing for one's fellow citizens and glorifying the flag reflects a belief in the common good and unity of the nation.
Source 2, a quote from Lieutenant-General Romeo Dallaire, presents a contrasting perspective on nationalism. Dallaire argues that in the new century, humanity should rise above divisions based on race, creed, color, religion, and national self-interest. His perspective prioritizes a universal sense of humanity over the narrower interests of tribes or nations.
This perspective aligns with the concept of cosmopolitanism, which emphasizes the idea that all human beings belong to a single, global community. Dallaire's emphasis on putting the good of humanity above tribal or national interests reflects a belief in the importance of international cooperation and a sense of shared responsibility for all people.
In interpreting these sources, it is important to consider the historical context in which they were made. Woodrow Wilson's speech was delivered during his presidency (1913-1921), a time characterized by American involvement in World War I and the rise of American exceptionalism. Lieutenant-General Romeo Dallaire's quote comes from a speech delivered in the late 20th century, the aftermath of international conflicts such as the Rwandan genocide and the growing recognition of global interdependence.
Overall, these sources reflect different perspectives on nationalism, with Wilson's speech emphasizing sacrifice and loyalty to the nation-state, and Dallaire's quote emphasizing a broader sense of humanity and global responsibility. Understanding the broader historical context and the concepts of civic nationalism and cosmopolitanism helps support the interpretations of these sources.