I'm comparing three different authors views on why the "rise of the west" occured in the 19th century. i have to compare ander gunder frank's "reorient", kenneth pomeranz' "the great divergence" and jack goldstone's "Why Europe? the rise of the west in global context"

and i need to know just the basic outline (not too in depth) of each view on the topic. thank you so so so much for any help that you can provide! :)

Sure! I can help you with a basic outline of each author's view on the topic of the "rise of the west" in the 19th century.

1. Andre Gunder Frank's "Reorient":
Frank's main argument in "Reorient" is that the rise of the West in the 19th century was not due to any inherent superiority or exceptionalism of Western societies, but rather the result of the exploitation and underdevelopment of non-Western regions by Western powers. He argues that Western dominance was primarily fueled by the economic and political relations established through colonization and trade, which helped the West accumulate wealth and power at the expense of the East.

2. Kenneth Pomeranz's "The Great Divergence":
Pomeranz offers a different perspective in "The Great Divergence." He argues that the rise of the West was influenced by geographical factors, specifically the availability of abundant natural resources in the Americas. Pomeranz contends that the potential for economic growth and development provided by the Americas' natural resources, combined with favorable geopolitical conditions in Europe, set the stage for Western dominance in the 19th century.

3. Jack Goldstone's "Why Europe? The Rise of the West in Global Context":
Goldstone takes a broader historical approach in "Why Europe?" He explores the rise of the West in the context of global demographic and political changes. He argues that fundamental transformations in Europe, such as the consolidation of nation-states, the development of capitalism, and the resilience of institutions, gave Europe an advantage over other regions. Additionally, he emphasizes the importance of Europe's ability to adapt to and benefit from the scientific and technological advancements of the time.

Remember, these are simplified summaries of each author's view. To gain a more comprehensive understanding, it is recommended to read the respective books and analyze the authors' arguments in more detail.