Dissent and altruism are a matter of personal conviction, but situation factors are involved also. Analyze five situational factors that are involved when a person decides to "rock the boat" and choose conscience over conformity.
I do not understand what it is that I need to write about, I no that Altruism is defined as showing selfless concern for the welfare of others and Dissent means to differ in opinion.
So am i suppose to write about how freedom of choice overides expected standards and give examples?
Yes, I think you've interpreted the assignment correctly.
The most dramatic example of altruism was shown by the passengers on Flight 93.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_93
Having a partner or partners who share the dissenting view helps a person override the expected standards.
The values and availability of various conformity and non-conforming choices also make a difference. With the airline passengers on Flight 93, the choice seems to be dying in a passive way or dying while resisting.
The estimated probability of making a change would also be another factor, along with the weight given to other consequences of conformity or nonconformity.
The ability to perform the altruistic response is also another factor. The ability of a non-swimmer to save a drowning person is essentially zero, unless there are other options beside swimming available (e.g., a boat, a lifeguard to be alerted, a float that could be thrown to the victim).
Well, before we dive into the analysis, let's remind ourselves that "rocking the boat" is not just a fun water sports activity. It refers to a situation where someone goes against the norm or challenges the status quo. When it comes to choosing conscience over conformity, here are five situational factors that may come into play:
1. Moral Dilemmas: Sometimes, people find themselves in situations where they have to make difficult ethical choices. These dilemmas can arise due to conflicts between personal values and societal expectations. Imagine you're at a dinner party where everyone believes it's okay to steal the last slice of pizza, but your moral compass tells you otherwise. You might decide to advocate for fairness and share that slice!
2. Social Pressure: Peer pressure can be a powerful force, pushing individuals to conform even when their conscience tells them otherwise. Picture this: your friends convince you to join them in a prank on April Fools' Day. But deep down, you feel uncomfortable about potentially hurting someone's feelings. Choosing to speak up and suggesting a harmless alternative would be a display of personal conviction.
3. Injustice: Witnessing unfair or unjust practices can motivate people to take a stand. When confronted with discrimination, some individuals choose to speak out against it, regardless of the potential consequences. It's like when you see someone trying to take a shortcut in a game of Monopoly and you raise your hand and call them out. Fair play for the win!
4. Leadership and Inspiration: Sometimes, individuals who possess strong moral convictions can inspire others to follow suit. Think about historical figures like Martin Luther King Jr., who led the civil rights movement by advocating for equality. When others witness such leadership, they may be encouraged to choose conscience over conformity themselves.
5. Personal Empathy: Empathy can play a crucial role in guiding our actions when faced with moral dilemmas. When individuals genuinely care about the well-being of others, they are more likely to choose acts of altruism over selfishness. If you witness someone being treated unjustly and you put yourself in their shoes, you might feel compelled to take action to help make things right.
So, in summary, situational factors such as moral dilemmas, social pressure, injustice, leadership, and personal empathy can all influence a person's decision to rock the boat and choose conscience over conformity. Remember, it's important to stand up for what you believe in, even if it means sailing through choppy waters.
Yes, you're on the right track. When analyzing the situational factors involved when a person chooses conscience over conformity, you should focus on how certain factors influence individuals to "rock the boat" and prioritize their personal convictions. Here are five situational factors to consider:
1. Ethical Dilemmas: When faced with ethical dilemmas, individuals may choose conscience over conformity. Situations that pose conflicts between personal beliefs and established norms or rules can push individuals to take a dissenting stance.
Example: An employee witnessing a colleague engaging in unethical behavior, such as fraud, may choose to report it to a higher authority despite potential backlash from their coworkers.
2. Injustice and Oppression: Instances of injustice or oppression often spark dissent as individuals feel compelled to stand up against unfairness. Situations that involve discrimination, inequality, or violation of basic human rights can motivate individuals to prioritize their conscience.
Example: People, inspired by the Black Lives Matter movement, joined protests against racial inequality and police brutality, despite the potential for conflict with law enforcement or public opinion.
3. Personal Convictions: When individuals strongly believe in a cause or value system, they may choose to dissent and uphold their personal convictions, even if it goes against societal norms or expectations. Personal values and principles often act as guiding forces in decision-making.
Example: Environmental activists engaging in acts of civil disobedience, from tree-sitting to protests, to bring attention to the urgency of climate change and environmental degradation.
4. Supportive Networks: Having a supportive network of like-minded individuals can provide a sense of empowerment and validation, making it easier to choose conscience over conformity. Being part of a group sharing the same values can encourage dissenting actions.
Example: LGBTQ+ individuals finding support from advocacy organizations and joining pride parades to express their true identities, despite societal pressures to conform.
5. Role Models and Inspiring Figures: Influential figures who have stood up against injustice or have made significant sacrifices for their beliefs can inspire others to follow in their footsteps. Role models can motivate individuals to choose conscience over conformity by providing examples of individuals who have made a positive impact.
Example: Malala Yousafzai, the youngest Nobel laureate, who stood against the oppression of girls' education by the Taliban in Pakistan, inspired countless individuals to fight for education equality.
Remember, these are just some examples of situational factors that can influence individuals to choose conscience over conformity. The decision to "rock the boat" is complex and multifaceted, often influenced by a combination of personal values, external circumstances, and individual experiences.
Yes, you are on the right track! In this case, you are being asked to analyze five situational factors that come into play when a person decides to prioritize their conscience and act against conformity. Here are five examples of situational factors that can influence someone's decision to "rock the boat" and choose conscience over conformity:
1. Moral dilemmas: When faced with moral dilemmas, individuals often have to make difficult choices between following societal expectations and doing what they believe is morally right. For example, a person may have to decide whether to speak up against an unfair policy at work, even if it means going against their colleagues or superiors.
2. Social pressure: Social pressure to conform can be a significant factor when deciding whether to dissent or uphold altruistic values. People may fear rejection or negative consequences if they go against the group consensus. However, situations where individuals feel passionate about a cause or are morally compelled to act can overcome this pressure.
3. Personal values: Each person has their own set of values and beliefs. When these strongly held values conflict with societal norms or expectations, individuals may choose to prioritize their personal convictions and act accordingly. For instance, someone may choose to actively support a cause or organization despite it being unpopular or contrary to prevailing beliefs.
4. Ethical considerations: Situations sometimes arise where individuals are confronted with ethical controversies in their personal or professional lives. These may include issues related to fairness, justice, or the greater good. Acting in accordance with their conscience and choosing altruism over conformity may be the result of a strong commitment to ethical principles.
5. Consequences and perceived impact: The potential consequences of their actions and the perceived impact on others can also influence a person's decision to prioritize their conscience over conformity. If individuals believe that their dissent or altruistic actions can make a positive difference or promote social justice, they may be more motivated to "rock the boat" regardless of potential negative outcomes.
When analyzing these situational factors, it is important to provide examples and support your analysis with evidence or real-life scenarios to strengthen your argument.