Does this sound good so far?

i need an opinon

I researched the genocide in Rwanda for my paper. In Rwanda, there are two major groups: The Hutu and the Tutsi. Even though the Hutu mad up 90% of the population in Rwanda, the Tutsi were basically the aristocrats of the country. After Rwanda gained independence from Belgium, the Hutu took control and overpowered the Tutsi. The Hutu also oppressed the Tutsis, causing them to flee to different countries to form their own rebel armies. One of the major rebel armies came back into Rwanda and forced the current president to allow the Hutu and the Tutsi share power. There were several Hutu who were truly and violently against sharing any power whatsoever with the Tutsi. Some of these Hutu wanted the extermination of all Tutsi.
On April 6th, 1994, the genocide started. 800,000 people were killed in the next one hundred days. The Hutu began beating the Tutsi to death. They used Machetes, grenades, and guns.

It would help to know what grade you're in as you write this assignment.

Delete the first sentence. It's redundant.

What you've written is very factual. Are you to be stating WHERE you are getting your information? Remember, to avoid plagiarism, you must cite your sources: http://library.duke.edu/research/citing/

As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions, but I can provide you with some analysis and information about the topic you have researched.

Based on the information you provided, it seems like you have summarized the historical context and events leading up to the genocide in Rwanda as well as the methods used during the genocide itself. However, it's important to note that the complexity of the genocide in Rwanda goes beyond a simple account of events.

To enhance your understanding and provide a more comprehensive analysis, you can consider the following points:

1. Historical background: Before the colonial era, the Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa ethnic groups coexisted in Rwanda. During the Belgian colonization, the colonial powers introduced identity cards and further divided and classified the population along ethnic lines, exacerbating existing tensions.

2. Socioeconomic disparities: While it is generally true that the Tutsi were often wealthier and held more influential positions during the precolonial and colonial eras, it is essential to acknowledge that socioeconomic status alone does not explain the genocide. Historical power dynamics, access to education, and other factors played a role in shaping these disparities.

3. Political turmoil: The assassination of Rwanda's President Juvenal Habyarimana, a Hutu, on April 6th, 1994, served as the catalyst for the genocide. Extremist Hutu factions within the government orchestrated a systematic campaign of violence against the Tutsi population and Hutu moderates who advocated for power-sharing.

4. Mass killings: The genocide was characterized by large-scale violence, including the use of machetes, firearms, and other weapons. Hutu militias, armed with the support of the government, targeted Tutsi individuals and communities. Notably, there were also courageous individuals and groups, both Hutu and Tutsi, who risked their lives to save others.

5. International response: The international community faced criticism for its inadequate response during the genocide. The United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) was ill-equipped and understaffed, leading to limited intervention. The lack of timely international intervention has been cited as a failure to prevent the mass killings.

Remember, when presenting research, it's crucial to provide accurate and balanced information, citing reliable sources and considering different perspectives. Exploring additional sources like books, scholarly articles, and documentaries can help you deepen your understanding of the complexities surrounding the genocide in Rwanda.